The Journal of Pain
Volume 6, Issue 9 , Pages 604-611, September 2005

Associations Among Four Modalities of Experimental Pain in Women

  • Kanokporn Bhalang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
    • Neurosensory Disorders Unit, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Kanokporn Bhalang, DDS, PhD, Department of Oral Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • Asgeir Sigurdsson

      Affiliations

    • Neurosensory Disorders Unit, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Gary D. Slade

      Affiliations

    • Neurosensory Disorders Unit, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    • Australian Researcher Center for Population Oral Health, Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
  • ,
  • William Maixner

      Affiliations

    • Neurosensory Disorders Unit, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Received 4 September 2004; received in revised form 15 March 2005; accepted 4 April 2005.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations among 4 measures of pain induction procedures in 244 healthy women. The procedures were (1) pressure pain threshold assessed over the temporalis muscles, masseter muscles, temporomandibular joints, and the wrists; (2) C fiber–mediated heat pain threshold/tolerance assessed on the skin over the forearm, cheek, and dorsal aspect of the foot; (3) temporal summation of C fiber–mediated heat pain; and (4) ischemic pain threshold/tolerance. Strong associations among pressure pain thresholds at the 4 sites examined (ρ = 0.7 to 0.8, P values ≤ .001) and among heat pain threshold/tolerance values at the 3 sites examined (ρ = 0.6 to 0.9, P values ≤ .001) were observed. Pressure pain threshold was moderately correlated with each of the heat pain threshold/tolerance values (ρ = 0.2 to 0.4, P values ≤ .001). Ischemic pain threshold/tolerance was moderately associated with each of the pressure and heat pain measures (ρ = 0.2 to 0.3, P values ≤ .05 to .001). Derived measures of the temporal summation of heat pain did not correlate strongly with threshold or tolerance measures of pressure, ischemic, or heat pain. We concluded (1) that for a specific pain modality, the correlation between threshold and tolerance values across anatomic sites is high, and (2) that measures of pressure, ischemic, and thermal pain threshold/tolerance are significantly correlated, although the strength of these associations is moderate. These findings demonstrate that a battery of pain-assessing procedures is required to determine an individual’s pain sensitivity profile or phenotype.

Perspective

By investigating the relationship between pain sensitivity produced by different forms of stimuli, this study demonstrates that a battery of tests should be used to assess an individual’s pain sensitivity and one should be careful in making inferences about an individual’s sensitivity to pain by using only one pain modality.

Key words:  Correlation , human experimental pain , pressure pain thresholds , thermal pain , ischemic pain , windup

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by NIH grants DE07509 and NS045685.

PII: S1526-5900(05)00639-5

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.04.006

The Journal of Pain
Volume 6, Issue 9 , Pages 604-611, September 2005