Erratum
Article Outline
In late 2004, we published three papers1, 2, 3 that performed secondary analyses using data from some of the study subjects included in a subsequent article, “Assessment of Pain Quality in Chronic Neuropathic and Nociceptive Pain: Clinical Trials with the Neuropathic Pain Scale.”4 Due to an oversight, we did not reference these three studies in the 2005 paper. Although the dependent variables in these studies were not the same, the focuses of the papers were different, and the subjects in the other three articles were only a subset of the subjects in Jensen et al., 2005, the authors wish to note these circumstances.
References
- . Effectiveness of the lidocaine patch 5% on pain qualities in three chronic pain states (assessment with the Neuropathic Pain Scale) . Curr Med Res Opin . 2004;20(suppl 2):S21–S28
- . Use of the lidocaine patch 5% in reducing intensity of various pain qualities reported by patients with low-back pain . Curr Med Res Opin . 2004;20(suppl 2):S5–S12
- . Lidocaine patch 5% and its positive impact on pain qualities in osteoarthritis (results of a pilot 2-week, open label study using the Neuropathic Pain Scale) . Curr Med Res Opin . 2004;20(suppl 2):S13–S19
- . Assessment of pain quality in chronic neuropathic and nociceptive pain (clinical trials with the Neuropathic Pain Scale) . J Pain . 2005;6:98–106
PII: S1526-5900(05)00778-9
doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.07.004
© 2005 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Assessment of pain quality in chronic neuropathic and nociceptive pain clinical trials with the Neuropathic Pain Scale
