The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 180-190, February 2009

Associations Between Catastrophizing and Endogenous Pain-Inhibitory Processes: Sex Differences

  • Burel R. Goodin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Lynanne McGuire

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Dr Lynanne McGuire, Psychology Department, UMBC, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250
  • ,
  • Mark Allshouse

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, York Campus, York, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Laura Stapleton

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Noel Burns

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Lacy A. Mayes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Robert R. Edwards

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Received 28 February 2008; received in revised form 8 August 2008; accepted 25 August 2008. published online 17 November 2008.

Abstract 

Pain catastrophizing is among the most robust predictors of pain outcomes, and a disruption in endogenous pain-inhibitory systems is 1 potential mechanism that may account for increased pain among individuals who report higher pain catastrophizing. Pain catastrophizing may negatively influence diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC), a measure of endogenous pain inhibition, through complex anatomical circuitry linking cortical responses to pain with processes that modulate pain. The current study examined whether DNIC mediated the relationship between catastrophizing and pain among 35 healthy young adults and examined the moderating effects of sex to determine whether the magnitude or direction of associations differed among men and women. DNIC was assessed using pressure pain thresholds on the forearm before and during a cold pressor task. Using bias-corrected bootstrapped confidence intervals, results showed that diminished DNIC was a significant partial mediator of the relation between greater pain-related catastrophizing and more severe pain ratings. Participant sex moderated these associations; higher catastrophizing predicted lower DNIC for men and women, however, the effect of catastrophizing on pain ratings was partially mediated by DNIC for women only. These findings further support the primary role of pain catastrophizing in modulation of pain outcomes.

Perspective

These findings support the hypothesis that the heightened pain reported by individuals higher in pain catastrophizing may be related to a disruption in the endogenous modulation of pain, operationalized by assessing DNIC. Whether interventions that reduce pain catastrophizing affect pain outcomes via effects on DNIC is in need of investigation.

Key words: Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, endogenous pain-inhibition, pain catastrophizing, sex differences

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R21AT003250-01A1 to L.M.; K23AR051315-01 and R21NS48593 to R.R.) and by a URA from the UMBC office of the Provost.

PII: S1526-5900(08)00739-6

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.08.012

The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 180-190, February 2009