The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 7 , Pages 715-722, July 2009

Analgesics Administered During Minor Painful Procedures in a Cohort of Hospitalized Infants: A Prospective Clinical Audit

  • Denise Harrison

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
    • School of Nursing and Social work, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    • Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    • Critical Care & Neurosciences, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Dr Denise Harrison, Centre for Nursing and the Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8.
  • ,
  • Peter Loughnan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Manias

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing and Social work, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Linda Johnston

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
    • School of Nursing and Social work, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    • Critical Care & Neurosciences, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

Received 21 October 2008; received in revised form 5 December 2008; accepted 17 December 2008. published online 24 April 2009.

Abstract 

A number of evidence-based consensus statements relating to pain in infants include recommendations concerning effective pain management during painful procedures. Yet numerous studies have shown that procedural pain remains poorly managed in neonatal intensive care units. The aim of this prospective clinical audit was to ascertain analgesics administered during skin-breaking, minor painful procedures occurring over the entire course of a hospitalization in a cohort of infants with a length of stay of 28 days or more. Data were collected on aspects relating to utilization of oral sucrose specifically for minor painful procedures as well as administration of opioid analgesics or other strong analgesics on the day the procedures were performed. A total of 3605 minor painful procedures were recorded for 55 infants during the study period, a mean of 65 minor procedures per infant. The majority of procedures recorded were heel lance (71%), followed by intravenous catheter insertion or venepuncture (14%). Either oral sucrose was specifically administered or background opioid analgesics were being administered during 85% of all minor painful procedures. These results show considerably higher frequency of analgesic use during acute minor painful procedures compared with similar studies of pain management practices in neonatal intensive care units.

Perspective

This study ascertained analgesics administered to sick infants during minor painful procedures during a prolonged hospitalization. Oral sucrose or morphine was administered during the most painful procedures, whereas 15% of procedures were performed with no analgesics. This illustrates a vast improvement compared with similar studies.

Key words: Infant, newborn, pain, procedural pain, analgesia, sucrose, morphine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and a Murdoch Childrens Research Institute trainee award for the duration of this study (Dr Harrison).

 There are no conflicts of interest to declare. There were no sponsors and no financial gain occurred for any authors at any stage throughout this study.

PII: S1526-5900(09)00009-1

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.011

The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 7 , Pages 715-722, July 2009