The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 8 , Pages 818-828, August 2009

Lacosamide in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: An 18-Week Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

  • Aziz Shaibani

      Affiliations

    • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Dr. Aziz Shaibani, Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas, 6624 Fannin, Suite 1670, Houston, TX 77030.
  • ,
  • Salah Fares

      Affiliations

    • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas, Houston, Texas
    • Wayne State University, Sinai Grace Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
  • ,
  • Jean-Louis Selam

      Affiliations

    • University Clinical Investigators, Inc., Diabetes Research Center, Tustin, California
  • ,
  • Armen Arslanian

      Affiliations

    • Beacon Clinical Research, Brockton, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Jeffrey Simpson

      Affiliations

    • SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES, Inc., a Member of the UCB Group, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • ,
  • David Sen

      Affiliations

    • SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES, Inc., a Member of the UCB Group, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Sabine Bongardt

      Affiliations

    • Schwarz Pharma, AG, UCB Group, Monheim, Germany

Received 10 March 2008; received in revised form 22 December 2008; accepted 26 January 2009. published online 01 May 2009.

Abstract 

The efficacy and tolerability of oral lacosamide (200, 400, and 600 mg/day) was evaluated in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The primary target dose to be confirmed was lacosamide 400 mg/day. Efficacy was assessed by changes in pain scale scores from baseline, with changes over the last 4 weeks of the 12-week maintenance period regarded as the primary endpoint. Endpoint reductions in mean pain score were higher with all doses of lacosamide, reaching the level of significance with 400 mg/day (P = .05). Over the treatment period (titration + maintenance), pain relief was significantly higher than placebo with lacosamide 400 (P = .02) and 600 mg/day (P = .03). Lacosamide had an early-onset effect with significant reductions over placebo during the titration period. Nonparametric and mixed-model analysis approaches gave similar results, supporting significant efficacy at 400 mg/day. Secondary criteria such as Patient's Global Impression of Change, responder rates, and pain-free days provided additional support. Adverse events included dizziness, nausea, and headache. Incidence of cognitive and behavioral adverse events was low. This trial suggests that lacosamide has beneficial effects and may be a suitable treatment option for patients with diabetic neuropathic pain.

Perspective

This study presents efficacy and safety results of a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the anticonvulsant drug lacosamide in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Lacosamide treatment at a dose of 400 mg/day reduced diabetic neuropathic pain with a favorable safety and tolerability profile that may be suitable for patients with diabetes.

Key words: Lacosamide, anticonvulsants, antiepileptics, diabetic neuropathic pain, painful distal diabetic neuropathy, clinical trial

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES, GmbH, UCB Group, Monheim, Germany, which provided the trial supplies, and SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES, Inc., UCB Group, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, which sponsored and funded the trial.

PII: S1526-5900(09)00310-1

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.01.322

The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 8 , Pages 818-828, August 2009