The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 9 , Pages 932-943, September 2009

Development and Preliminary Testing of a Computerized Adaptive Assessment of Chronic Pain

  • Milena D. Anatchkova

      Affiliations

    • QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, Rhode Island
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Dr Milena Anatchkova, QualityMetric Incorporated, 24 Albion Road, Bldg 400, Lincoln, RI 02865.
  • ,
  • Renee N. Saris-Baglama

      Affiliations

    • QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, Rhode Island
  • ,
  • Mark Kosinski

      Affiliations

    • QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, Rhode Island
  • ,
  • Jakob B. Bjorner

      Affiliations

    • QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, Rhode Island
    • National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Dr Milena Anatchkova, QualityMetric Incorporated, 24 Albion Road, Bldg 400, Lincoln, RI 02865.

Received 7 October 2008; received in revised form 10 January 2009; accepted 6 March 2009. published online 13 July 2009.

Abstract 

The aim of this article is to report the development and preliminary testing of a prototype computerized adaptive test of chronic pain (CHRONIC PAIN-CAT) conducted in 2 stages: (1) evaluation of various item selection and stopping rules through real data–simulated administrations of CHRONIC PAIN-CAT; (2) a feasibility study of the actual prototype CHRONIC PAIN-CAT assessment system conducted in a pilot sample. Item calibrations developed from a US general population sample (N = 782) were used to program a pain severity and impact item bank (κ = 45), and real data simulations were conducted to determine a CAT stopping rule. The CHRONIC PAIN-CAT was programmed on a tablet PC using QualityMetric's Dynamic Health Assessment (DYHNA) software and administered to a clinical sample of pain sufferers (n = 100). The CAT was completed in significantly less time than the static (full item bank) assessment (P < .001). On average, 5.6 items were dynamically administered by CAT to achieve a precise score. Scores estimated from the 2 assessments were highly correlated (r = .89), and both assessments discriminated across pain severity levels (P < .001, RV = .95). Patients' evaluations of the CHRONIC PAIN-CAT were favorable.

Perspective

This report demonstrates that the CHRONIC PAIN-CAT is feasible for administration in a clinic. The application has the potential to improve pain assessment and help clinicians manage chronic pain.

Key words: Pain assessment, computerized adaptive testing, chronic pain, item response theory

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by Small Business Innovation Research Grant #1R43AR052251-01A1 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

PII: S1526-5900(09)00452-0

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.007

The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 9 , Pages 932-943, September 2009