The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 9 , Pages 976-983, September 2009

Comparison of Health Care Use and Costs in Newly Diagnosed and Established Patients With Fibromyalgia

  • Leigh Ann White

      Affiliations

    • Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Rebecca L. Robinson

      Affiliations

    • Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Ms Rebecca L. Robinson, Eli Lily and Co, Lilly Research Labs, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46259.
  • ,
  • Andrew P. Yu

      Affiliations

    • Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Anna Kaltenboeck

      Affiliations

    • Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Seth Samuels

      Affiliations

    • Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • David Mallett

      Affiliations

    • Ingenix, Inc, Rocky Hill, Connecticut
  • ,
  • Howard G. Birnbaum

      Affiliations

    • Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 6 October 2008; received in revised form 19 February 2009; accepted 18 March 2009. published online 25 June 2009.

Abstract 

In 2004, the American Pain Society (APS) issued evidence-based fibromyalgia treatment recommendations. The objective of this claims database analysis is to describe prescription and medical use in patients with newly diagnosed and established fibromyalgia. Privately insured patients with 2+ myalgia/myositis claims (1999 to 2005) were categorized as newly diagnosed or established; this dichotomy involves comparisons between prediagnosis (S1) and postdiagnosis (S2) stages in the newly diagnosed and between newly diagnosed (S2) and established patients (S3). Use of APS guideline medications increased across stages: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (S1, S2, S3: 20.6%, 22.9%, 25.3%), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (4.5%, 6.4%, 8.9%), pregabalin/gabapentin (5.4%, 7.4%, 8.8%), benzodiazepines (19.0%, 21.1%, 24.2%), non-benzodiazepine sedatives (9.1%, 11.5%, 13.7%) (all P < .0001), and opioids (39.5%, 43.3%, 43.9%; S1 vs S2, P < .0001; S2 vs S3, P = .2835). Use of multiple therapeutic classes also increased across stages: 3+ classes (7.1%, 9.6%, 11.8%) (all P < .0001). Office visits to providers increased, on average, after diagnosis: primary care (70.9%, 78.3%, 76.3%; all P < .0001), chiropractors (28.8%, 51.1%, 53.3%; all P < .0001), rheumatologists (4.2%, 9.9%, 10.5%; S1 vs S2, P < .0001; S2 vs S3, P = .0595), mental health (6.4%, 7.3%, 8.3%; S1 vs S2, P < .0001, S2 vs S3, P = .0003). Average health care costs rose after diagnosis in the newly diagnosed group (S1: $6555 vs S2: $8654, P < .0001).

Perspective

This paper investigates prescription drug and medical care use with respect to stages of fibromyalgia diagnosis. Established fibromyalgia patients use more medical resources and have higher rates of concomitant medication use than newly diagnosed fibromyalgia patients. Findings can help educate providers regarding optimal drug treatment patterns in this population.

Key words: Fibromyalgia, medication use, health care costs, treatment patterns

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by Eli Lilly and Company.

PII: S1526-5900(09)00470-2

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.012

The Journal of Pain
Volume 10, Issue 9 , Pages 976-983, September 2009