The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 53-61, January 2010

An Investigation Into the Hypoalgesic Effects of High- and Low-Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Experimentally-Induced Blunt Pressure Pain in Healthy Human Participants

  • Chih-Chung Chen

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health, Leeds Metropolitan University, Civic Quarter, Leeds, United Kingdom
    • Leeds Pallium Research Group, www.leeds.ac.uk/pallium.
  • ,
  • Mark I. Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health, Leeds Metropolitan University, Civic Quarter, Leeds, United Kingdom
    • Leeds Pallium Research Group, www.leeds.ac.uk/pallium.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Professor Mark I Johnson, Faculty of Health, Leeds Metropolitan University, Civic Quarter, Leeds LS1 3HE, United Kingdom.

Received 27 February 2009; received in revised form 1 May 2009; accepted 29 May 2009. published online 10 August 2009.

Abstract 

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive technique used to reduce pain. It is claimed that TENS frequency is a key determinant of outcome. This study compared TENS delivered at 3 pulses per second (pps) and 80 pps on blunt pressure pain in human participants when TENS intensity was standardized at a strong nonpainful level. Thirty-two pain-free participants completed an experiment in which they received TENS at 3 pps and 80 pps in a crossover fashion. An algometer was used to measure pain threshold for each frequency before and during 20 minutes of TENS. A statistically significant elevation in pain threshold relative to baseline was found for 80 pps when compared to 3 pps after 10 and 20 minutes of TENS (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). After 20 minutes of TENS, 30 of 32 participants had exceeded a 10N elevation in threshold relative to baseline during 80 pps compared to 19 participants during 3 pps (odds ratio 10.3 (CI, 2.28, 44.78), P = .002). We suggest that the higher rates of impulse generation by TENS at 80 pps resulted in a stronger afferent input to the central nervous system, resulting in stronger segmental inhibition of nociceptive transmission of second-order neurones, in line with the gate control theory of pain. In conclusion, strong nonpainful TENS at 80 pps was superior to 3 pps at increasing pressure-pain threshold in healthy volunteers. We recommend a follow-up study using pain patients.

Perspective

This study provides evidence that high frequency TENS at 80 pulses per second increases pain threshold to pressure algometry in healthy participants over and above that seen with low frequency TENS at 3 pulses per second when a strong nonpainful TENS sensation is experienced within the site of experimental pain.

Key words: Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS), pain measurement, analgesia, pain threshold, nontherapeutic human experimentation, pressure algometry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This project was funded by the Faculty of Health at Leeds Metropolitan University.

PII: S1526-5900(09)00572-0

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.05.008

The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 53-61, January 2010