« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 2
, Pages 109-118
, February 2010
The Clinical Importance of Changes in the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale for Worst, Least, and Average Pain Intensity: Analyses of Data from Clinical Trials of Duloxetine in Pain Disorders
References
- . A double-blind, multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia patients with or without major depressive disorder. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(9):2974–2984
- . A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in the treatment of women with fibromyalgia with or without major depressive disorder. Pain. 2005;119:5–15
- . Which outcome measures should be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials? Clinical and quality-of-life measures' responsiveness to treatment in a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1568–1580
- . The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:683–691
- . Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23(2):129–138
- . A diagnostic and therapeutic N-of-1 randomized trial. Can J Psychiatry. 1993;38:251–254
- . The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ. 1995;310:452–454
- . Duloxetine, 60 mg once daily, for major depressive disorder: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:308–315
- . Duloxetine 60 mg once daily dosing versus placebo in the acute treatment of major depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2002;36:383–390
- . The Descriptor Differential Scale of Pain Intensity: An evaluation of item and scale properties. Pain. 1995;61:251–260
- . Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9:105–121
- . Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000;88:287–294
- . Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–158
- . Clinical importance of changes in pain intensity: An analysis of data from clinical trials of duloxetine in pain disorders [abstract]. J Pain. 2006;4:S39
- . Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: Development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:561–565
- . Duloxetine vs. placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain. 2005;116:109–118
- . Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials. BMJ. 1998;316:690–693
- . Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: The state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1989;29:307–335
- . Measuring change over time: A comparison of results from a global single item of health status and the multi-dimensional SF-36 health status survey questionnaire in patients presenting with menorrhagia. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:317–321
- . Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:81–87
- . Global impressions versus validated measures of treatment effectiveness in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Rehabil Psychol. 1999;44:194–207
- . Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:82
- NIMH. 1976: ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised 1976. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch. pp 217-222, 313-331
- . Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine. 2008;33:90–94
- . The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17:45–56
- . A double-blind, randomized multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain Med. 2005;6:346–356
- . Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004;8:283–291
- . Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:47–48
- . Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:485–489
- . Neglected topics in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: Determination of success. Pain. 1993;53:3–16
- . Variables for assessing shoulder pain following stroke: A modified Delphi survey. Can J Rehabil. 1996;10:25–34
- . A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Neurology. 2006;67:1411–1420
This work utilized data from clinical trials sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
PII: S1526-5900(09)00588-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.007
© 2010 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 2
, Pages 109-118
, February 2010
