The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 87-96, January 2010

Multi-Modal Examination of Psychological and Interpersonal Distinctions Among MPI Coping Clusters: A Preliminary Study

  • Doerte U. Junghaenel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Doerte U. Junghaenel, PhD, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science, Putnam Hall, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8790.
  • ,
  • Francis J. Keefe

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Joan E. Broderick

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York

Received 26 February 2009; received in revised form 3 June 2009; accepted 13 June 2009. published online 27 September 2009.

Abstract 

The Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) is a widely used instrument to characterize distinct psychosocial subgroups of patients with chronic pain: Adaptive (AC), Dysfunctional (DYS), and Interpersonally Distressed (ID). To date, several questions remain about the validity and distinctiveness of the patient clusters, and continued scientific attention has strongly been recommended. It is unclear if AC patients experience better adjustment or merely present themselves favorably. Moreover, differences in psychological distress and interpersonal relations between DYS and ID patients are equivocal. The present study is the first to utilize comprehensive informant ratings to extend prior validity research on the MPI. We employed a multimodal methodology consisting of patient self-report, parallel informant ratings, and behavioral measures. Ninety-nine patients with chronic pain, their partners, and providers participated. They completed measures of patients' psychological distress and social relations. We also systematically observed patients' pain behavior. Results provided strong support for the validity of the AC cluster in that patients' positive adaptation was reliably corroborated by informants. The differentiating characteristics between the 2 maladaptive clusters, however, remain elusive. We found evidence that DYS patients' distress appeared to be illness specific rather than generalized; however, both clusters were equally associated with social distress and partner/caregiver burden.

Perspective

An adaptive style of coping with chronic pain is reliably recognized by patients' partners and healthcare providers. Differences between a dysfunctional and an interpersonally distressed coping style, however, remain unclear. Patients with a dysfunctional style appear more distressed by their illness but both styles are characterized by social difficulties.

Key words: Pain, interpersonal, coping, validity, adaptation, proxy, assessment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported in part by the Applied Behavioral Medicine Research Institute, Stony Brook University, and by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01 AR054626; Joan E. Broderick, principal investigator).

PII: S1526-5900(09)00589-6

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.006

The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 87-96, January 2010