The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 4 , Pages 351-359, April 2010

Feasibility Study of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Cancer Bone Pain

  • Michael I. Bennett

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Palliative Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Michael I. Bennett, Professor of Palliative Medicine, International Observatory on End of Life Care, School of Health and Medicine, Bowland Tower East, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • Mark I. Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Pain and Analgesia, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Sarah R. Brown

      Affiliations

    • Senior Medical Statistician, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Helen Radford

      Affiliations

    • Senior Research Nurse, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Julia M. Brown

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Director, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Robert D. Searle

      Affiliations

    • Specialist Registrar & Honorary Lecturer in Anaesthesia St James's University Hospital, Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Received 28 April 2009; received in revised form 8 July 2009; accepted 4 August 2009. published online 23 October 2009.

Abstract 

This multicenter study assessed the feasibility of conducting a phase III trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in patients with cancer bone pain recruited from palliative care services. Eligible patients received active and placebo TENS for 1 hour at site of pain in a randomized crossover design; median interval between applications 3 days. Responses assessed at 30 and 60 minutes included numerical and verbal ratings of pain at rest and on movement, and pain relief. Recruitment, tolerability, adverse events, and effectiveness of blinding were also evaluated. Twenty-four patients were randomised and 19 completed both applications. The intervention was well tolerated. Five patients withdrew: 3 due to deteriorating performance status, and 2 due to increased pain (1 each following active and placebo TENS). Confidence interval estimation around the differences in outcomes between active and placebo TENS suggests that TENS has the potential to decrease pain on movement more than pain on rest. Nine patients did not consider that a placebo was used; the remaining 10 correctly identified placebo TENS. Feasibility studies are important in palliative care prior to undertaking clinical trials. Our findings suggest that further work is required on recruitment strategies and refining the control arm before evaluating TENS in cancer bone pain.

Perspective

Cancer bone pain is common and severe, and partly mediated by hyperexcitability. Animal studies suggest that Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation can reduce hyperalgesia. This study examined the feasibility of evaluating TENS in patients with cancer bone pain in order to optimize methods before a phase III trial.

Key words: Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS), pain, cancer of bone, randomized controlled trial, palliative care

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by Cancer Research UK (C18324 / A7715) with additional support from an unrestricted grant awarded by Cephalon.

PII: S1526-5900(09)00663-4

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002

The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 4 , Pages 351-359, April 2010