The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 5 , Pages 454-461, May 2010

Evaluation of Nurses' Self-Insight Into Their Pain Assessment and Treatment Decisions

  • Adam T. Hirsh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
    • Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Adam T. Hirsh, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Box 356490, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195-6490.
  • ,
  • Mark P. Jensen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Michael E. Robinson

      Affiliations

    • Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Received 19 May 2009; received in revised form 29 July 2009; accepted 1 September 2009. published online 16 December 2009.

Abstract 

Research generally indicates that providers demonstrate modest insight into their clinical decision processes. In a previous study utilizing virtual human (VH) technology, we found that patient demographic characteristics and facial expressions of pain were statistically significant predictors of many nurses' pain-related decisions. The current study examined the correspondence between the statistically identified and self-reported influences of contextual information on pain-related decisions. Fifty-four nurses viewed vignettes containing a video of a VH patient and text describing a postsurgical context. VH sex, race, age, and facial expression varied across vignettes. Participants made pain-assessment and treatment decisions on visual analogue scales. Participants subsequently indicated the information they relied on when making decisions. None of the participants reported using VH sex, race, or age in their decision process. Statistical modeling indicated that 28 to 54% of participants (depending on the decision) used VH demographic cues. 76% of participants demonstrated concordance between their reported and actual use of the VH facial expression cue. Vital signs, text-based clinical summary, and VH movement were also reported as influential factors. These data suggest that biases may be prominent in practitioner decision-making about pain, but that providers have minimal awareness of and/or a lack of willingness to acknowledge this bias.

Perspective

The current study highlights the complexity of provider decision-making about pain management. The VH technology could be used in future research and education applications aimed at improving the care of all persons in pain.

Key words: Pain management, disparities, virtual human technology, decision policies, self awareness

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F31 NS049675), National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research (2R56 DE013208-05A1), and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Center for Rehabilitation Research (T32 HD007424).

PII: S1526-5900(09)00718-4

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.09.004

The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 5 , Pages 454-461, May 2010