The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 9 , Pages 876-884, September 2010

Changes in Situation-Specific Pain Catastrophizing Precede Changes in Pain Report During Capsaicin Pain: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis Among Healthy, Pain-Free Participants

  • Claudia M. Campbell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Dr Claudia M. Campbell, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Suite 100, Baltimore, MD 21224.
  • ,
  • Phillip J. Quartana

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Luis F. Buenaver

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Robert R. Edwards

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts

Received 7 July 2009; received in revised form 7 December 2009; accepted 11 December 2009. published online 20 May 2010.

Abstract 

Considerable evidence has linked catastrophizing to pain responses, and recent experimental pain research has suggested that situational catastrophizing, measured during or immediately after laboratory pain procedures, is strongly related to pain ratings of standardized noxious stimuli. However, given that most experimental pain protocols involve “static” assessments of pain ratings and catastrophizing at a single time point, the direction by which these factors may affect each other remains unclear. Does catastrophizing influences one's subsequent pain responses or do individual differences in the perceived severity of pain lead to differential rates of catastrophizing? Little is known regarding the course of these variables. Using a cross-lagged panel analysis, we evaluated whether changes in situation-specific catastrophizing preceded changes in laboratory-induced pain responses, or vice versa, during tonic capsaicin pain stimulation. Topical application of a 10% capsaicin cream was applied to the dorsal aspect of the nondominant hand of 38 healthy participants. Situation-specific catastrophizing and pain ratings were obtained at Early (0 to 15 minutes), Mid (15 to 30 minutes), and Final (30 to 35 minutes) periods during capsaicin pain. Analyses revealed that Early-to-Mid changes in catastrophizing ratings prospectively accounted for unique variance in subsequent Mid-to-Final changes in pain ratings, whereas Early-to-Mid changes in pain ratings did not account for unique variance in Mid-to-Final changes in catastrophizing ratings. That is, participants who showed the largest initial increases in catastrophizing reported the greatest subsequent increases in pain. Controlling for the reported change in stress did not affect this pattern of results. These findings provide empirical evidence that a situation-specific catastrophizing process might precede and contribute to subsequent increases in pain experience. Limitations of the present study and possible future research directions are discussed.

Perspective

The present study adds to a growing literature on prospective associations between catastrophizing and pain. These results provide initial evidence, in healthy individuals, that changes in catastrophizing may precede changes in pain response.

Key words: Pain, catastrophizing, experimental pain, capsaicin, cross-lagged panel design

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by NIH grant AT001433 and with resources from F32 NS06362.

PII: S1526-5900(09)00909-2

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.12.007

The Journal of Pain
Volume 11, Issue 9 , Pages 876-884, September 2010