The Journal of Pain
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 222-227, February 2011

The Influence of Non-Nociceptive Factors on Hot-Plate Latency in Rats

Department of Psychology, Washington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, Washington

Received 26 March 2010; received in revised form 9 June 2010; accepted 28 June 2010. published online 27 August 2010.

Abstract 

The hot plate is a widely used test to assess nociception. The effect of non-nociceptive factors (weight, sex, activity, habituation, and repeated testing) on hot-plate latency was examined. Comparison of body weight and hot-plate latency revealed a small but significant inverse correlation (light rats had longer latencies). Habituating rats to the test room for 1 hour prior to testing did not decrease hot-plate latency except for female rats tested on days 2 to 4. Hot-plate latency decreased with repeated daily testing, but this was not caused by a decrease in locomotor activity or learning to respond. Activity on the hot plate was consistent across all 4 trials, and prior exposure to a room-temperature plate caused a similar decrease in latency as rats tested repeatedly on the hot plate. Despite this decrease in baseline hot-plate latency, there was no difference in morphine antinociceptive potency. The present study shows that weight, habituation to the test room, and repeated testing can alter baseline hot-plate latency, but these effects are small and have relatively little impact on morphine antinociception.

Perspective

This manuscript shows that non-nociceptive factors such as body weight, habituation, and repeated testing can alter hot-plate latency, but these factors do not alter morphine potency. In sum, the hot-plate test is an easy to use and reliable method to assess supraspinally organized nociceptive responses.

Key words: Pain, nociception, sex differences, hyperalgesia, morphine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by NIH grant DA015498 and by funds provided for medical and biological research by the State of Washington Initiative Measure No. 171.

PII: S1526-5900(10)00597-3

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.06.011

The Journal of Pain
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 222-227, February 2011