The Journal of Pain
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 222-227 , February 2011

The Influence of Non-Nociceptive Factors on Hot-Plate Latency in Rats

Received 26 March 2010 ,Revised 9 June 2010 ,Accepted 28 June 2010.

References 

  1. Ankier SI. New hot plate tests to quantify antinociceptive and narcotic antagonist activities. Eur J Pharmacol. 1974;27:1–4
  2. Bannon AW, Malmberg AB: Models of nociception: Hot-plate, tail-flick, and formalin tests in rodents. Curr Protoc Neurosci:Chapter 8:Unit 8.9, 2007
  3. Bardo MT, Hughes RA. Exposure to a nonfunctional hot plate as a factor in the assessment of morphine-induced analgesia and analgesic tolerance in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1979;10:481–485
  4. Chesler EJ, Wilson SG, Lariviere WR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Mogil JS. Identification and ranking of genetic and laboratory environment factors influencing a behavioral trait, thermal nociception, via computational analysis of a large data archive. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:907–923
  5. Christina A, Merlin N, Vijaya C. Jayaprakash S Murugesh N: Daily rhythm of nociception in rats. J Circadian Rhythms. 2004;2:2
  6. Eddy NB, Leimbach D. Synthetic analgesics. II. Dithienylbutenyl- and dithienylbutylamines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1953;107:385–393
  7. Gamble GD, Milne RJ. Repeated exposure to sham testing procedures reduces reflex withdrawal and hot-plate latencies: Attenuation of tonic descending inhibition?. Neurosci Lett. 1989;96:312–317
  8. Gebhart GF, Mitchell CL. Further studies on the development of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine: The role played by the cylinder in the hot plate testing procedure. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1971;191:96–103
  9. Gebhart GF, Mitchell CL. The relative contributions of the testing cylinder and the heated plate in the hot plate procedure to the development of tolerance to morphine in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1972;18:56–62
  10. Hunskaar S, Berge OG, Hole K. A modified hot-plate test sensitive to mild analgesics. Behav Brain Res. 1986;21:101–108
  11. Ingram SL, Fossum EN, Morgan MM. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for opioid tolerance in adolescent rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:600–606
  12. Jacob J. Some effects of morphine adaptive and learning behavior. In:  Votava Z editors. Psychopharmacological Methods. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1963;p. 70–79
  13. Knoll J, Kelemen K, Knoll B. Experimental studies on the higher nervous activity of animals: I. A method for the eleboration of a non-extinguishable conditioned reflex in the rat. Acta Physiol Hung. 1955;8:327–344
  14. Lai YY, Chan SH. Shortened pain response time following repeated algesiometric tests in rats. Physiol Behav. 1982;28:1111–1113
  15. Lane DA, Morgan MM. Antinociceptive tolerance to morphine from repeated nociceptive testing in the rat. Brain Res. 2005;1047:65–71
  16. Le Bars D, Gozariu M, Cadden SW. Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53:597–652
  17. Milne RJ, Gamble GD, Holford NH. Behavioural tolerance to morphine analgesia is supraspinally mediated: A quantitative analysis of dose-response relationships. Brain Res. 1989;491:316–327
  18. Morgan MM, Fossum EN, Levine CS, Ingram SL. Antinociceptive tolerance revealed by cumulative intracranial microinjections of morphine into the periaqueductal gray in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006;85:214–219
  19. Morgan MM, Fossum EN, Stalding BM, King MM. Morphine antinociceptive potency on chemical, mechanical, and thermal nociceptive tests in the rat. J Pain. 2006;7:358–366
  20. Morgan MM, Sohn JH, Liebeskind JC. Stimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter inhibits nociception at the supraspinal as well as spinal level. Brain Res. 1989;502:61–66
  21. O'Callaghan JP, Holtzman SG. Quantification of the analgesic activity of narcotic antagonists by a modified hot-plate procedure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975;192:497–505
  22. Plone MA, Emerich DF, Lindner MD. Individual differences in the hotplate test and effects of habituation on sensitivity to morphine. Pain. 1996;66:265–270
  23. Romero A, Miranda HF, Puig MM. Analysis of the Opioid-Opioid Combinations According to the Nociceptive Stimulus in Mice. Pharmacol Res. 2010;61:511–518
  24. Stoffel EC, Ulibarri CM, Craft RM. Gonadal steroid hormone modulation of nociception, morphine antinociception and reproductive indices in male and female rats. Pain. 2003;103:285–302
  25. Suh HH, Fujimoto JM, Tseng LF. Different radiant heat intensities differentiate intracerebroventricular morphine- from beta-endorphin-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response in the mouse. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;213:337–341
  26. Taber RI: Predictive value of analgesic assays in mice and rats. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol 8:191-211, 1973
  27. Van Ree JM, Leys A. Behavioral effects of morphine and phencyclidine in rats: The influence of repeated testing before and after single treatment. Eur J Pharmacol. 1985;113:353–362
  28. Van Waas M, Soffie M. Differential environmental modulations on locomotor activity, exploration and spatial behaviour in young and old rats. Physiol Behav. 1996;59:265–271
  29. Woolf G, MacDonald AL. The evaluation of the analgesic action of pethidine hydrochloride (Demerol). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1944;80:300–307

 Supported by NIH grant DA015498 and by funds provided for medical and biological research by the State of Washington Initiative Measure No. 171.

PII: S1526-5900(10)00597-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.06.011

The Journal of Pain
Volume 12, Issue 2 , Pages 222-227 , February 2011