Advertisement

Initial Psychometric Properties of the Pain Care Quality Survey (PainCQ)

      Abstract

      This study examined the psychometric properties of the Pain Care Quality (PainCQ) survey, a new instrument to measure the quality of nursing and interdisciplinary care related to pain management. Hospitalized medical/surgical oncology patients with pain from 3 states completed the 44-item version of the PainCQ survey following completion of a nursing shift. Interdisciplinary items were evaluated over the entire hospital stay; nursing care was evaluated during the previous shift. The sample included 109 patients ranging in age from 20 to 84 (mean = 53.09). The sample was 58.7% female, 88% non-Hispanic white. Principal Axis Factoring with an oblimin rotation was used as factors were correlated. Two scales resulted. The PainCQ-Interdisciplinary scale included 11 items representing 2 constructs and explaining 47.1% of shared item variance: partnership with the health care team (k = 6 items; α = .85) and comprehensive interdisciplinary pain care (k = 5 items; α = .76). The PainCQ-Nursing scale measured three constructs and explained 60.8 % of shared item variance: being treated right (k = 15 items; α = .95), comprehensive nursing pain care (k = 3 items; α = .77), and efficacy of pain management (k =4 items; α = .87). Results supported the internal consistency reliability and structural validity of the PainCQ survey with 33 items.

      Perspective

      This article presents the psychometric properties of a new tool to measure interdisciplinary and nursing care quality related to pain management from the patient's perspective. This tool can be used for research and as a clinical performance measure to monitor and improve quality of care and patient outcomes.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Pain
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Beck S.L.
        • Towsley G.L.
        • Berry P.H.
        • Lindau K.
        • Field R.B.
        • Jensen S.
        Core aspects of satisfaction with pain management: Cancer patients' perspectives.
        J Pain Sympt Manage. 2010; 39: 100-115
      1. Beck SL, Towsley GL, Berry PH, Brant JM, Smith EL: Measuring the quality of care related to pain management: A multiple method approach to instrument development. Nurs Res 59:85-92, 2010

        • Cleeland C.S.
        Measurement of pain by subjective report.
        in: Chapman C.R. Loeser J.D. Issues in Pain Measurement. Raven Press, New York1989: 391-403
      2. CMS: Available at: http://www.hcahpsonline.org. Accessed April 20, 2009

        • Coker E.
        • Papaioannou A.
        • Turpie I.
        • Dolovich L.
        • Kaasalainen S.
        • Taniguchi A.
        • Burns S.
        Pain management practices with older adults on acute medical units: Perspectives.
        Gerontol Nurs Assoc (Canada). 2008; 32: 5-12
        • Corizzo C.C.
        • Baker M.C.
        • Henkelmann G.C.
        Assessment of patient satisfaction with pain management in small community inpatient and outpatient settings.
        Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000; 27: 1279-1286
        • Daut R.L.
        • Cleeland C.S.
        • Flanery R.C.
        Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases.
        Pain. 1983; 17: 197-210
        • Dawson R.
        • Spross J.A.
        • Jablonski E.S.
        • Hoyer D.R.
        • Sellers D.E.
        • Solomon M.Z.
        Probing the paradox of patients' satisfaction with inadequate pain management.
        J Pain Sympt Manage. 2002; 23: 211-220
        • Desbiens N.A.
        • Wu A.W.
        • Broste S.K.
        • Wenger N.S.
        • Connors A.F.J.
        • Lynn J.
        • Yasui Y.
        • Phillips R.S.
        • Fulkerson W.
        Pain and satisfaction with pain control in seriously ill hospitalized adults: Findings from the SUPPORT research investigations; for the SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
        Crit Care Med. 1996; 24: 1953-1961
        • Dozier A.M.
        • Kitzman H.J.
        • Ingersoll G.L.
        • Holmberg S.
        • Schultz A.W.
        Development of an instrument to measure patient perception of the quality of nursing care.
        Res Nurs Health. 2001; 24: 506-517
        • Dulko D.
        Audit and feedback as a clinical practice guideline implementation strategy: A model for acute care nurse practitioners.
        Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007; 4: 200-209
      3. Foundation RWJ: INQRI: Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative. Available at: http://www.inqri.org/ProgramOverview.html. Accessed November 23, 2009

        • Gordon D.B.
        • Pellino T.A.
        • Miaskowski C.
        • McNeill J.A.
        • Paice J.A.
        • Laferriere D.
        • Bookbinder M.
        A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: Recommendations for standardized outcome measures.
        Pain Manag Nurs. 2002; 3: 116-130
        • Idvall E.
        Post-operative patients in severe pain but satisfied with pain relief.
        J Clin Nurs. 2002; 11: 841-842
        • Jenkinson C.
        • Coulter A.
        • Bruster S.
        • Richards N.
        • Chandola T.
        Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: Results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11: 335-339
        • Lin C.C.
        • Ward S.E.
        Patient-related barriers to cancer pain management in Taiwan.
        Cancer Nurs. 1995; 18: 16-22
        • Lynn M.R.
        • Moore K.
        Relationship between traditional quality indicators and perceptions of care.
        Semin Nurse Manag. 1997; 5: 187-193
        • McGuire D.B.
        Occurrence of cancer pain.
        J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004; 32: 51-55
        • Merkouris A.
        • Yfantopoulos J.
        • Lanara V.
        • Lemonidou C.
        Developing an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with nursing care in Greece.
        J Nurs Manag. 1999; 7: 91-100
        • Miaskowski C.
        • Nichols R.
        • Brody R.
        • Synold T.
        Assessment of patient satisfaction utilizing the American Pain Society's Quality Assurance Standards on acute and cancer-related pain.
        J Pain Sympt Manage. 1994; 9: 5-11
        • Mularski R.A.
        • White-Chu F.
        • Overbay D.
        • Miller L.
        • Asch S.M.
        • Ganzini L.
        Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 607-612
        • Nelson A.
        • Powell-Cope G.
        • Buffum M.
        • Hagan S.
        • Quigley P.
        • O'Neal D.
        Measures of the quality of pain management by nurses.
        Medical Care Res Rev: MCRR. 2007; 64
        • Pett M.M.
        • Lackey N.R.
        • Sullivan J.
        Making Sense of Factor Analysis.
        Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. 2003;
      4. Press Ganey Surveys and Reports. Available at: http://www.pressganey.com/cs/our_services/surveys_and_reports. Accessed July 15, 2009

        • Radwin L.
        • Alster K.
        • Rubin K.M.
        Development and testing of the Oncology Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale.
        Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003; 30: 283-290
        • Sapnas K.G.
        • Zeller R.A.
        Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement.
        J Nurs Meas. 2002; 10: 135-154
        • Sawyer J.
        • Haslam L.
        • Robinson S.
        • Daines P.
        • Stilos K.
        Pain prevalence study in a large Canadian teaching hospital.
        Pain Manag Nurs. 2008; 9: 104-112
        • Serlin R.C.
        • Mendoza T.R.
        • Nakamura Y.
        • Edwards K.R.
        • Cleeland C.S.
        When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function.
        Pain. 1995; 61: 277-284
        • Whelan C.T.
        • Jin L.
        • Meltzer D.
        Pain and satisfaction with pain control in hospitalized medical patients: No such thing as low risk.
        Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164: 175-180
        • Worthington R.L.
        • Whittaker T.A.
        Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices.
        Counsel Psychologist. 2006; 34: 806-838