Advertisement

Sequential and Base Rate Analysis of Emotional Validation and Invalidation in Chronic Pain Couples: Patient Gender Matters

      Abstract

      The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which communication patterns that foster or hinder intimacy and emotion regulation in couples were related to pain, marital satisfaction, and depression in 78 chronic pain couples attempting to problem-solve an area of disagreement in their marriage. Sequences and base rates of validation and invalidation communication patterns were almost uniformly unrelated to adjustment variables unless patient gender was taken into account. Male patient couples’ reciprocal invalidation was related to worse pain, but this was not found in female patient couples. In addition, spouses’ validation was related to poorer patient pain and marital satisfaction, but only in couples with a male patient. It was not only the presence or absence of invalidation and validation that mattered (base rates), but the context and timing of these events (sequences) that affected patients’ adjustment. This research demonstrates that sequences of interaction behaviors that foster and hinder emotion regulation should be attended to when assessing and treating pain patients and their spouses.

      Perspective

      This article presents analyses of both sequences and base rates of chronic pain couples’ communication patterns, focusing on validation and invalidation. These results may potentially improve psychosocial treatments for these couples, by addressing sequential interactions of intimacy and empathy.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to The Journal of Pain
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Affleck G.
        • Tennen H.
        • Keefe F.J.
        • Lefebvre J.C.
        • Kashikar-Zuck S.
        • Wright K.
        • Starr K.
        • Caldwell D.S.
        Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: Independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain, mood, and coping.
        Pain. 1999; 83: 601-609
        • Bakeman R.
        • Gottman J.M.
        Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis.
        Cambridge University Press, New York, NY1997
        • Bakeman R.
        • Quera V.
        • McArthur D.
        • Robinson B.F.
        Detecting sequential patterns and determining their reliability with fallible observers.
        Psychol Methods. 1997; 2: 357-370
        • Bruckner C.T.
        • Yoder P.
        Interpreting kappa in observational research: Baserate matters.
        Am J Ment Retard. 2006; 111: 95-110
        • Cano A.
        • Barterian J.A.
        • Heller J.B.
        Empathic and nonempathic interaction in chronic pain couples.
        Clin J Pain. 2008; 24: 678-684
        • Cano A.
        • Leonard M.
        Integrative behavioral couple therapy for chronic pain: Promoting behavior change and emotional acceptance.
        J Clin Psychol. 2006; 62: 1409-1418
        • Cano A.
        • Williams A C de C
        Social interaction in pain: Reinforcing pain behaviors or building intimacy?.
        Pain. 2010; 149: 9-11
        • Christensen A.
        • Heavey C.L.
        Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict.
        J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990; 59: 73-81
        • Cohen J.
        A power primer.
        Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155-159
        • Currie S.R.
        • Wang J.
        Chronic back pain and major depression in the general Canadian population.
        Pain. 2004; 107: 54-60
        • Ekman P.
        • Friesen W.V.
        Unmasking The Face.
        Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1975
        • Fillingim R.B.
        • Edwards R.R.
        • Powell T.
        The relationship of sex and clinical pain to experimental pain responses.
        Pain. 1999; 83: 419-425
        • First M.
        • Gibbon M.
        • Spitzer R.L.
        • Williams J.B.
        User’s Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders-Research Version-(SCID-I for DSM-IV-TR, November 2002 version).
        Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY2002
        • Fischer A.H.
        Sex differences in emotionality: Fact or stereotype?.
        Fem Psychol. 1993; 3: 303-318
        • Folstein M.
        • Folstein S.
        • McHugh P.
        Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician.
        J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 31: 251-259
        • Fruzzetti A.E.
        • Iverson K.M.
        Mindfulness, acceptance, validation, and “individual” psychopathology in couples.
        in: Hayes S.C. Follette V.M. Linehan M.M. Mindfulness and Acceptance: Expanding the Cognitive-Behavioral Tradition. Guilford Press, New York, NY2004: 168-191
        • Fruzzetti A.E.
        • Iverson K.M.
        Intervening with couples and families to treat emotion dysregulation and psychopathology.
        in: Snyder D.K. Simpson J. Hughes J.N. Emotion Regulation in Couples and Families: Pathways to Dysfunction and Health. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC2006: 249-267
        • Gilligan C.
        In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development.
        Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA1982
        • Gottman J.M.
        Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations.
        Academic Press, New York, NY1979
        • Gottman J.M.
        What Predicts Divorce? The Relationship Between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes.
        Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ1994
        • Gottman J.M.
        • Coan J.
        • Carrere S.
        • Swanson C.
        Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions.
        J Marriage Fam. 1998; 60: 5-22
        • Gottman J.M.
        • McCoy K.
        • Coan J.
        • Collier H.
        The specific affect coding system (SPAFF).
        in: Gottman J.M. What Predicts Divorce? The Measures. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ1996: 131-143
        • Goubert L.
        • Craig K.
        • Vervoort T.
        • Morley S.
        • Sullivan M.J.L.
        • Williams A C de C
        • Cano A.
        • Crombez G.
        Facing others in pain: The effects of empathy.
        Pain. 2005; 118: 285-288
        • Gross J.J.
        The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review.
        Rev Gen Psychol. 1998; 2: 271-299
        • Heyman R.E.
        Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.
        Psychol Assess. 2001; 13: 5-35
        • Hooven C.
        • Rushe R.
        • Gottman J.M.
        The play-by-play interview.
        in: Gottman J.M. What Predicts Divorce? The Measures. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ1996 (pp. PPIM-1-26)
        • Johansen A.
        • Cano A.
        A preliminary investigation of affective interaction in chronic pain couples.
        Pain. 2007; 132: S86-S95
        • Kerns R.D.
        • Turk D.C.
        • Rudy T.E.
        The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI).
        Pain. 1985; 23: 345-356
        • Kiecolt-Glaser J.K.
        • Newton T.
        Marriage and health: His and hers.
        Psychol Bull. 2001; 127: 472-503
        • Leong L.
        • Cano A.
        • Johansen A.B.
        Sequential analysis of validation and invalidation in couples with chronic pain.
        J Pain. 2009; 10: S69
        • Long E.C.J.
        • Angera J.J.
        • Carter S.J.
        • Nakamoto M.
        • Kalso M.
        Understanding the one you love: A longitudinal assessment of an empathy training program for couples in romantic relationships.
        Fam Relat. 1999; 48: 235-242
        • McCabe S.B.
        • Gotlib I.H.
        Interactions of couples with and without a depressed spouse: Self-report and observations of problem-solving situations.
        J Soc Pers Relat. 1993; 10: 589-599
        • Miller L.R.
        • Cano A.
        Comorbid chronic pain and depression: Who is at risk?.
        J Pain. 2009; 10: 619-627
        • Mitchell A.E.
        • Castellani A.M.
        • Herrington R.L.
        • Joseph J.I.
        • Doss B.D.
        • Snyder D.K.
        Predictors of intimacy in couples’ discussions of relationship injuries: An observational study.
        J Fam Psychol. 2008; 22: 21-29
        • Newton-John T.R.O.
        • Williams A C de C
        Chronic pain couples: Perceived marital interactions and pain behaviours.
        Pain. 2006; 123: 53-63
        • Plant E.A.
        • Hyde J.S.
        • Keltner D.
        • Devine P.G.
        The gender stereotyping of emotions.
        Psychol Women Q. 2000; 24: 81-92
        • Reidy D.E.
        • Dimmick K.
        • MacDonald K.
        • Zeichner A.
        The relationship between pain tolerance and trait aggression: Effects of sex and gender role.
        Aggress Behav. 2009; 35: 422-429
        • Reis H.T.
        • Shaver P.
        Intimacy as an interpersonal process.
        in: Duck S. Handbook of Interpersonal Relationships. Wiley, Chichester, UK1988: 367-389
        • Romano J.M.
        • Jensen M.P.
        • Turner J.A.
        • Good A.B.
        • Hops H.
        Chronic pain patient-partner interactions: Further support for a behavioral model of chronic pain.
        Behav Ther. 2000; 31: 415-440
        • Romano J.M.
        • Turner J.A.
        • Friedman L.S.
        • Bulcroft R.A.
        • Jensen M.P.
        • Hops H.
        • Wright S.F.
        Sequential analysis of chronic pain behaviors and spouse responses.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992; 60: 777-782
        • Romano J.M.
        • Turner J.A.
        • Jensen M.P.
        • Friedman L.S.
        • Bulcroft R.A.
        • Hops H.
        • Wright S.F.
        Chronic pain patient-spouse behavioral interactions predict patient disability.
        Pain. 1995; 63: 353-360
        • Sanford K.
        Problem-solving conversations in marriage: Does it matter what topics couples discuss?.
        Pers Relatsh. 2003; 10: 97-112
        • Schwartz L.
        • Slater M.A.
        • Birchler G.R.
        • Atkinson J.H.
        Depression in spouses of chronic pain patients: The role of patient pain and anger, and marital satisfaction.
        Pain. 1991; 44: 61-67
        • Smith S.J.A.
        • Keefe F.J.
        • Caldwell D.S.
        • Romano J.
        • Baucom D.
        Gender differences in patient-spouse interactions: A sequential analysis of behavioral interactions in patients having osteoarthritic knee pain.
        Pain. 2004; 112: 183-187
        • Spanier G.
        Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.
        J Marriage Fam. 1976; 38: 15-28
        • Spitznagel E.L.
        • Helzer J.E.
        A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic.
        Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985; 42: 725-728
      1. Watson D, Clark LA. Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire. Located at: Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Department of Psychology, Iowa City, IA., 1991

        • Watson D.
        • Weber K.
        • Assenheimer J.S.
        • Clark L.A.
        • Strauss M.E.
        • McCormick R.A.
        Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales.
        J Abnorm Psychol. 1995; 104: 3-14