Estimating Efficacy and Drug ED50's Using von Frey Thresholds: Impact of Weber's Law and Log Transformation


      The use of von Frey filaments, originally developed by Maximilian von Frey, has become the cornerstone for assaying mechanical sensitivity in animal models and is widely used for human assessment. While there are certain limitations associated with their use that make comparisons between studies not straightforward at times, such as stimulus duration and testing frequency, von Frey filaments provide a good measurement of mechanosensation. Here we describe the application of von Frey filaments to testing in animal models, specifically with respect to determining changes in sensory thresholds in a pain state using the Dixon up-down method. In a literature survey, we found that up to 75% of reports using this method analyze the data with parametric statistical analysis and of those that used nonparametric analysis, none took into account that mechanical sensation is perceived on a logarithmic scale (Weber's Law) when calculating efficacy. Here we outline a more rigorous analysis for calculating efficacy and ED50's from von Frey data that incorporates Weber's Law. We show that this analysis makes statistical and biological sense and provide a specific example of how this change affects data analysis that brings results from animal models more in line with clinical observations.


      This focus article argues that analyzing von Frey paw withdrawal threshold data obtained by using the Dixon up-down method without considering Weber's Law is inappropriate. An analysis method that incorporates how mechanical sensation is perceived and how its application brings results from animal models more in line with clinical data is presented.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Pain
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Chaplan S.R.
        • Back F.W.
        • Pogrel J.W.
        • Chung J.M.
        • Yaksh T.L.
        Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw.
        J Neurosci Methods. 1994; 53: 55-63
        • Dixon W.J.
        The up-and-down method for small samples.
        J Am Statist Assoc. 1965; 60: 967-978
        • Dixon W.J.
        Efficient analysis of experimental observations.
        Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1980; 20: 441-462
      1. Mills CD; PubMed search: First 100 articles with key word search for spinal nerve ligation, run 9.12.11, and first 100 articles with key word chronic constriction injury, run 9.13.11. Limitations: English, free full text

        • Whiteside G.T.
        • Adedoyin A.
        • Leventhal L.
        Predictive validity of animal pain models? A comparison of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for pain drugs in rats and humans.
        Neuropharm. 2008; 54: 767-775