The Infancy of Infant Pain Research: The Experimental Origins of Infant Pain Denial


      Skepticism toward infant pain characterized much of 20th century research and clinical practice, with infant surgery routinely conducted with minimal or no anesthesia into the 1980s. This paper offers a historical exploration of how this view became common by reviewing and analyzing the experimental infant pain research of the 19th and early 20th centuries that contributed to the development of infant pain denial. These experiments used pinprick and electric shock, and the results were generally interpreted as evidence of infants’ underdeveloped pain perception, attributed to their lack of brain maturation. Even clear responses to noxious stimuli were often dismissed as reflex responding. Later these experimental findings were used by anesthesiologists to support the lessened use of anesthesia for infants. Based on the reviewed literature, this paper suggests that 4 interrelated causes contributed to the denial of infant pain: the Darwinian view of the child as a lower being, extreme experimental caution, the mechanistic behaviorist perspective, and an increasing emphasis on brain and nervous system development. Ultimately this history can be read as a caution to modern researchers to be aware of their own biases, the risks of null hypothesis testing, and a purely mechanistic view of infants.


      This article reviews the history of 19th and early 20th century infant pain research, tracing how the widely accepted belief that infants could not feel pain developed in the period prior to the growing acceptance of infant pain. Four interrelated causes are posited to help explain the tolerance of infant pain denial until recent times.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Pain
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Anand K.J.S.
        • Hickey P.R.
        Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus.
        N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 1321-1329
        • Boakes R.
        From Darwin to behaviorism: Psychology and the minds of animals.
        Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK1984
        • Baños J.E.
        • Ruiz G.
        • Guardiola E.
        An analysis of articles on neonatal pain published from 1965 to 1999.
        Pain Res Manag. 2001; 6: 45-50
        • Berde C.
        Local anesthetics in infants and children: An update.
        Pediatr Anesth. 2004; 4: 387-393
        • Berry F.A.
        • Gregory G.A.
        Do premature infants require anesthesia for surgery?.
        Anesthesiology. 1987; 67: 291-293
        • Bigelow J.
        Ether and choloroform: Their discovery and physiological effects. Ether and Chloroform: A Compendium of their History, Surgical Use, Dangers and Discovery.
        David Clapp, Boston, MA1848
        • Blanton M.G.
        The behavior of the human infant in the first 30 days of life.
        Psychol Rev. 1917; 24: 456-483
        • Boring E.G.
        A History of Experimental Psychology.
        Century, New York, NY1942
        • Chamberlain D.B.
        Babies don’t feel pain: A century of denial in medicine.
        J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health. 1999; 14: 145-168
        • Crudden C.H.
        Reactions of newborn infants to thermal stimuli under constant tactual conditions.
        J Exp Psychol. 1937; 20: 350-370
        • Darwin C.
        A biographical sketch of an infant.
        Mind. 1877; 2: 285-294
        • Darwin C.
        The expression of the emotions in man and animals.
        John Murray, London, UK1872
        • Derbyshire S.W.
        Locating the beginnings of pain.
        Bioethics. 1999; 13: 1-31
        • Derbyshire S.W.
        Can fetuses feel pain?.
        Br Med J. 2006; 332: 909-912
        • Derbyshire S.W.
        Foetal pain?.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 24: 647-655
      1. Dockeray FC, Rice C: Responses of newborn infants to pain stimulation. Ohio State University Studies Contributing to Psychology 12:82-93, 1934

        • Fabrizi L.
        • Slater R.
        • Worley A.
        • Meek J.
        • Boyd S.
        • Olhede S.
        • Fitzgerald M.
        A shift in sensory processing that enables the developing human brain to discriminate touch from pain.
        Curr Biol. 2001; 21: 1-7
      2. Genzmer A: Untersuchugen Ueber die Sinneswahrhehumugen des Neugeborenen Menschen. Inaugural Dissertation. Halle, DE, Plötzche Buchhandlung, 1873

        • Graham F.K.
        • Matarazzo R.G.
        • Caldwell B.M.
        Behavioral differences between normal and traumatized newborns: II. Standardization, reliability, and validity.
        Psychol Monogr. 1956; 70: 17-33
        • Graham F.K.
        • Pennoyer M.M.
        • Caldwell B.M.
        • Greenman M.
        • Hartmann A.F.
        Relationship between clinical status and behavior test performances in a newborn group with histories suggesting anoxia.
        Pediatrics. 1957; 50: 177
        • Guardiola E.
        • Baños J.E.
        Is there an increasing interest in pediatric pain? Analysis of the biomedical articles published in the 1980s.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 1993; 8: 449-450
      3. International Association for the Study of Pain Taxonomy: Pain. Available at: Accessed 20/07/2012

        • Jensen K.
        Differential reactions to taste and temperature stimuli in newborn infants.
        Genet Psychol Monogr. 1932; 12: 363-479
        • Kumar N.
        WHO Normative Guidelines on Pain Management: Report of a Delphi Study to determine the need for guidelines and to identify the number and topics of guidelines that should be developed by WHO.
        World Health Organization, Geneva, CH2007
        • Kussmaul A.
        Untersuchungen über das Seelenleben des Neugebormen Menschem.
        Winter, Leipzig, DE1859
        • Lawson J.
        Birth. 1986; 13: 125
        • Lawson J.
        N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 1198
        • Liddell H.S.
        • James W.T.
        • Anderson O.D.
        The comparative physiology of the conditioned motor reflex: Based on experiments with the pig, dog, sheep, goat and rabbit.
        Comp Psychol Monogr. 1934; 12: 89
        • Lipsitt L.P.
        • Levy N.
        Electrostatic threshold in the neonate.
        Child Dev. 1959; 30: 547-554
        • McGrath P.J.
        Science is not enough: The modern history of pediatric pain.
        Pain. 2011; 152: 2457-2459
        • McGraw M.
        Growth: A study of Johnny and Jimmy.
        Appleton Century Crofts, New York, NY1935
        • McGraw M.
        Neural maturation as exemplified in the changing reactions of the infant to pin prick.
        Child Dev. 1941; 12: 31-42
        • McGraw M.
        The Neuromuscular Maturation of the Human Infant.
        Hafner Publishing, New York, NY1969
        • Noon D.H.
        The evolution of beasts and babies: Recapitulation, instinct, and early discourse on child development.
        J Hist Behav Sci. 2005; 41: 367-386
        • Owens M.E.
        Pain in infancy: Conceptual and methodological issues.
        Pain. 1984; 20: 213-230
        • Owens M.E.
        • Todt E.H.
        Pain in infancy: Neonatal reaction to a heel lance.
        Pain. 1984; 20: 77-86
        • Pabis E.
        • Kowalczyk M.
        • Kulik T.B.
        [Pain in children in historical perspective.] Article in Polish.
        Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2010; 42: 37-41
        • Peiper A.
        Die hirntütigkeit des neugeborenen.
        Jahrbuch fur Kinderheilkunde. 1926; 29: 290-314
        • Peiper A.
        Untersuchungen über die reaktionszeit auf schmertzreiz.
        Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1926; 32: 136-143
        • Peiper A.
        Cerebral Function in Infancy and Childhood.
        Consultants Bureau, New York, NY1961/1963
        • Peirson A.L.
        Early operation for harelip.
        Am J Med Sci. 1852; 24: 576
        • Pernick M.S.
        A Calculus of Suffering: Pain professionalism and anesthesia in nineteenth-century America.
        Columbia University Press, New York, NY1985
      4. Pillai Riddell RR, Racine NR, Turcotte K, Uman L, Horton R, Ahola Kohut S, Din Osmun L, Hillgrove Stuart J, Stevens BJ, Gerwitz-Stein A: Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10, Art. No.: CD006275, 2011

        • Pratt K.C.
        The neonate.
        in: Carmichael L. Manual of Child Psychology. 2nd edition. Wiley, New York, NY1954: 215-291
      5. Pratt KC, Nelson AK, Sun KH: The behavior of the newborn infant. Ohio State University Studies Contributing to Psychology 10:144-167, 1930

        • Preyer W.
        The Mind of the Child: The development of the intellect.
        Arno Press, New York, NY1889
        • Purcell-Jones G.
        • Dormon F.
        • Sumner E.
        Paediatric anaesthetists’ perceptions of neonatal and infant pain.
        Pain. 1988; 33: 181-187
        • Rey R.
        The History of Pain.
        Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA1995
        • Rich E.C.
        • Marshall R.E.
        • Volpe J.J.
        The normal neonatal response to pin-prick.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 1974; 16: 432-434
        • Saroyan J.M.
        • Schechter W.S.
        • Tresgallo M.E.
        • Sun L.
        • Vaqvi Z.
        • Graham M.J.
        Assessing resident knowledge of acute pain management in hospitalized children: A pilot study.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008; 36: 628-637
        • Schechter N.L.
        • Allan D.A.
        • Hanson K.
        Status of pediatric pain control: A comparison of hospital analgesic usage in children and adults.
        Pediatrics. 1986; 7: 11-15
        • Schuster J.A.
        • Yeo R.R.
        The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method: Historical Studies.
        Reidel, Dordrecht, DE1986
        • Sherman M.
        • Sherman I.C.
        Sensorimotor responses in infants.
        J Comp Psychol. 1925; 5: 53-68
        • Sherman M.
        • Sherman I.
        • Flory C.D.
        Infant behavior.
        Comp Psychol Monogr. 1936; 12: 1-107
        • Shinn M.W.
        Notes on the Development of a Child.
        University of California Press, Berkeley, CA18931899
        • Siegel A.
        • White S.
        The child-study movement: Early growth and development of the symbolized child.
        Adv Child Dev Behav. 1982; 17: 233-285
        • Stephen C.R.
        • Ahlgren E.W.
        • Bennett E.J.
        Elements of Pediatric Anesthesia.
        2nd edition. Thomas, Springfield, IL1970
        • Stevens B.J.
        • Abbott L.K.
        • Yamada J.
        • Harrison D.
        • Stinson J.
        • Taddio A.
        • Barwich M.
        • Latimer M.
        • Scott S.D.
        • Rachotte J.
        • Campbell F.
        • Finley G.A.
        • CIHR Team in Children’s Pain
        Epidemiology and management of painful procedures in children in Canadian hospitals.
        CMAJ. 2011; 183: 403-410
        • Stevens B.
        • Pillai Riddell R.R.
        • Oberlander T.
        • Gibbins S.
        Assessment of pain in neonates and infants.
        in: Anand K.J. Stevens B.J. McGrath P. Pain in Neonates and Infant. 3rd edition. Elsevier Limited, Edinburgh, UK2007: 76-91
        • Swafford L.L.
        • Allan D.
        Pain relief in the pediatric patient.
        Med Clin North Am. 1968; 52: 131-136
        • Taddio A.
        • Katz J.
        • Ilersich A.L.
        • Koren G.
        Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination.
        Lancet. 1997; 349: 599-603
        • Taddio A.
        • Shah V.
        • Gilbert-MacLeod C.
        • Katz J.
        Conditioning and hyperalgesia in newborns exposed to repeated heellances.
        JAMA. 2002; 288: 857-861
        • Trotter T.
        A view of the nervous temperament: Being a practical inquiry into the increasing prevalence, prevention, and treatment of those diseases commonly called nervous bilious, stomach and liver complaints.
        Wright, Goodenow, & Stockwell, Troy, NY1808
        • Unruh A.M.
        Voices from the past: Ancient views of pain in childhood.
        Clin J Pain. 1992; 8: 247-254
        • von Baeyer C.L.
        • Marche T.A.
        • Rocha E.M.
        • Salmon K.
        Children’s memory for pain: Overview and implications for practice.
        J Pain. 2004; 5: 241-249
        • Watson J.B.
        Psychology as the behaviorist views it.
        Psychol Rev. 1913; 20: 158-177
        • Weber E.H.
        De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Anatationes Anatomicae et Physiologicae.
        Koehler, Leipzig, DE1834
        • Weber E.H.
        Der tastsinn und das gemeingefühl.
        in: Handwörterbuch der Physiologie. Vol. 3. Vieweg, Brunswick, DE1846: 481-588
        • Wesson S.C.
        Ligation of ductus arteriosus: Anesthesia management of the tiny premature infant.
        J Am Assoc Nurse Anesth. 1982; 50: 579-582
        • Wolowick A.B.
        Uber die gegenseitige wirkung der schmerz- und nahrungsreflexe bei kindern.
        Jahrbuch für Kinderheilkunde und Physische Erziehung. 1927; 115: 185-193
        • Yeo R.
        Scientific Method and the Image of Science, 1831-1891.
        in: MacLeod R. Collins P. The Parliament of Science: The British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1831-1981. Science Reviews, Norwood, PA1981: 65-88