Advertisement

Integration of Pain Score and Morphine Consumption in Analgesic Clinical Studies

      Abstract

      In pain clinical trials, the rescue analgesic medication such as patient-controlled analgesia morphine is often made available for patients for breakthrough pain. The patient-controlled analgesia morphine usage decreases the study agent's effect on pain relative to placebo and introduces greater variability in attainment of pain scores. For assessment of analgesic efficacy, the isolated statistical analysis of pain score or morphine consumption as a surrogate marker for pain not only loses statistical efficiency but also may incur increased false-positive findings because of multiple testing. The aim of this article is to review the research to date for choices of statistical tests for pain or morphine consumption outcome, with a focus on systematically evaluating a means for collective analgesic assessment of pain and morphine consumption using an integrated outcome. A case example is illustrated for data visualization, statistical comparison, and effect size estimation using the new endpoint. Some implications for clinical practice and further research are discussed.

      Perspective

      This article provides statistical evidence to conclude that an integrated outcome of pain score and morphine consumption provides an efficient means for integrated analgesic assessment.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Pain
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Agresti A.
        Generalized odds ratios for ordinal data.
        Biometrics. 1980; 36: 59-67
        • Ahdieh H.
        • Ma T.
        • Babul N.
        • Lee D.
        Efficacy of oxymorphone extended release in postsurgical pain: A randomized clinical trial in knee arthroplasty.
        J Clin Pharmacol. 2004; 44: 767-776
        • Akhtar-Danesh N.
        A review of statistical methods for analysing pain measurements.
        Eur J Pain. 2001; 5: 457-463
        • Akhtar-Danesh N.
        • Appleton D.R.
        Using an antedependence test to analyse post-operative pain measurements.
        Stat Med. 2000; 19: 1889-1899
        • Arkinstall W.
        • Sandler A.
        • Goughnour B.
        • Babul N.
        • Harsanyi Z.
        • Darke A.C.
        Efficacy of controlled-release codeine in chronic non-malignant pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
        Pain. 1995; 62: 169-178
        • Chelly J.
        • Ploskanych T.
        • Dai F.
        • Nelson J.
        Multimodal analgesic approach incorporating paravertebral blocks for open radical retropubic prostatectomy: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.
        Can J Anesth. 2011; 58: 371-378
        • Chen Y.H.
        • Zhou X.H.
        Interval estimates for the ratio and difference of two lognormal means.
        Stat Med. 2006; 25: 4099-4113
        • Dahabreh I.J.
        • Sheldrick R.C.
        • Paulus J.K.
        • Chung M.
        • Varvarigou V.
        • Jafri H.
        • Rassen J.A.
        • Trikalinos T.A.
        • Kitsios G.D.
        Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes.
        Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 1893-1901
        • David C.
        • Jason K.
        • Pamela S.
        • Karen H.
        • David A.A.
        Designing pain research from the patient's perspective: What trial end points are important to patients with chronic pain?.
        Pain Med. 2001; 2: 309-316
        • Dexter F.
        Analysis of statistical tests to compare doses of analgesics among groups.
        Anesthesiology. 1994; 81: 610-615
        • Dexter F.
        • Chestnut D.H.
        Analysis of statistical tests to compare visual analog scale measurements among groups.
        Anesthesiology. 1995; 82: 896-902
        • Dhaliwal H.S.
        • Sloan P.
        • Arkinstall W.W.
        • Thirlwell M.P.
        • Babul N.
        • Harsanyi Z.
        • Darke A.C.
        Randomized evaluation of controlled-release codeine and placebo in chronic cancer pain.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995; 10: 612-623
        • Divine G.
        • Kapke A.
        • Havstad S.
        • Joseph C.L.M.
        Exemplary data set sample size calculation for Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests.
        Stat Med. 2010; 29: 108-115
        • Dworkin R.H.
        • Gnann Jr., J.W.
        • Oaklander A.L.
        • Raja S.N.
        • Schmader K.E.
        • Whitley R.J.
        Diagnosis and assessment of pain associated with herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia.
        J Pain. 2008; 9: S37-S44
        • Dworkin R.H.
        • Turk D.C.
        • Peirce-Sandner S.
        • Baron R.
        • Bellamy N.
        • Burke L.B.
        • Chappell A.
        • Chartier K.
        • Cleeland C.S.
        • Costello A.
        • Cowan P.
        • Dimitrova R.
        • Ellenberg S.
        • Farrar J.T.
        • French J.A.
        • Gilron I.
        • Hertz S.
        • Jadad A.R.
        • Jay G.W.
        • Kalliomäki J.
        • Katz N.P.
        • Kerns R.D.
        • Manning D.C.
        • McDermott M.P.
        • McGrath P.J.
        • Narayana A.
        • Porter L.
        • Quessy S.
        • Rappaport B.A.
        • Rauschkolb C.
        • Reeve B.B.
        • Rhodes T.
        • Sampaio C.
        • Simpson D.M.
        • Stauffer J.W.
        • Stucki G.
        • Tobias J.
        • White R.E.
        • Witter J.
        Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.
        Pain. 2010; 149: 177-193
        • Farrar J.T.
        Advances in clinical research methodology for pain clinical trials.
        Nat Med. 2010; 16: 1284-1293
        • Fitzmaurice G.M.
        • Ravichandran C.
        A primer in longitudinal data analysis.
        Circulation. 2008; 118: 2005-2010
        • Friedrich J.
        • Adhikari N.
        • Beyene J.
        The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: A simulation study.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8: 32
        • Friedrich J.O.
        • Adhikari N.K.J.
        • Beyene J.
        Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 556-564
        • Gambling D.
        • Hughes T.
        • Martin G.
        • Horton W.
        • Manvelian G.
        A comparison of Depodur' a novel, single-dose extended-release epidural morphine, with standard epidural morphine for pain relief after lower abdominal surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2005; 100: 1065-1074
        • Gilron I.
        • Orr E.
        • Tu D.
        • Peter O'Neill J.
        • Zamora J.E.
        • Bell A.C.
        A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of perioperative administration of gabapentin, rofecoxib and their combination for spontaneous and movement-evoked pain after abdominal hysterectomy.
        Pain. 2005; 113: 191-200
        • Hedeker D.
        • Gibbons R.D.
        Longitudinal Data Analysis.
        Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ2006
        • Huang P.
        • Goetz C.G.
        • Woolson R.F.
        • Tilley B.
        • Kerr D.
        • Palesch Y.
        • Elm J.
        • Ravina B.
        • Bergmann K.J.
        • Kieburtz K.
        • Parkinson Study Group
        Using global statistical tests in long-term Parkinson's disease clinical trials.
        Mov Disord. 2009; 24: 1732-1739
        • Hubbard R.C.
        • Naumann T.M.
        • Traylor L.
        • Dhadda S.
        Parecoxib sodium has opioid-sparing effects in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia.
        Br J Anaesth. 2003; 90: 166-172
        • Katz J.
        • Clairoux M.
        • Redahan C.
        • Kavanagh B.P.
        • Carroll S.
        • Nierenberg H.
        • Jackson M.
        • Beattie J.
        • Taddio A.
        • Sandler A.N.
        High dose alfentanil pre-empts pain after abdominal hysterectomy.
        Pain. 1996; 68: 109-118
        • Kitchen C.M.
        Nonparametric vs parametric tests of location in biomedical research.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147: 571-572
        • Ledolter J.
        • Dexter F.
        Analysis of interventions influencing or reducing patient waiting while stratifying by surgical procedure.
        Anesth Analg. 2011; 112: 950-957
        • Lehmann K.
        Patient-controlled analgesia.
        in: The Design of Analgesic Clinical Trials (Advances in Pain Research and Therapy). Vol. 18. Raven Press, New York, NY1991: 481-506
        • Liang K.Y.
        • Zeger S.L.
        Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models.
        Biometrika. 1986; 73: 13-22
        • Liu S.
        • Angel J.M.
        • Owens B.D.
        • Carpenter R.L.
        • Isabel L.
        Effects of epidural bupivacaine after thoracotomy.
        Reg Anesth. 1995; 20: 303-310
        • Liu S.
        • Carpenter R.L.
        • Mulroy M.F.
        • Weissman R.M.
        • McGill T.J.
        • Rupp S.M.
        • Allen H.W.
        Intravenous versus epidural administration of hydromorphone. Effects on analgesia and recovery after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
        Anesthesiology. 1995; 82: 682-688
        • Ludbrook J.
        Advantages of permutation (randomization) tests in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology.
        Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1994; 21: 673-686
        • Ludbrook J.
        Issues in biomedical statistics: Comparing means by computer-intensive tests.
        Aust N Z J Surg. 1995; 65: 812-819
        • Mascha E.J.
        • Turan A.
        Joint hypothesis testing and gatekeeping procedures for studies with multiple endpoints.
        Anesth Analg. 2012; 114: 1304-1317
        • Max M.B.
        Methodological issues in the design of analgesic clinical trials.
        in: Portenoy R.K. Bruera E. Issues in Palliative Care Research. Oxford University Press, New York, NY2003: 3-21
        • Max M.B.
        Afterword: Five steps to increase the payoff of chronic pain trials.
        Neurology. 2005; 65: S74-S77
        • Mercadante S.
        Celiac plexus block versus analgesics in pancreatic cancer pain.
        Pain. 1993; 52: 187-192
        • Mercadante S.
        Scoring the effect of radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.
        Support Care Cancer. 2006; 14: 967-969
        • Moore R.A.
        • Derry C.J.
        • Derry S.
        • Straube S.
        • McQuay H.J.
        A conservative method of testing whether combination analgesics produce additive or synergistic effects using evidence from acute pain and migraine.
        Eur J Pain. 2012; 16: 585-591
        • Moore R.A.
        • Mhuircheartaigh R.J.N.
        • Derry S.
        • McQuay H.J.
        Mean analgesic consumption is inappropriate for testing analgesic efficacy in post-operative pain: Analysis and alternative suggestion.
        Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011; 28: 427-432
        • O'Brien P.C.
        Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints.
        Biometrics. 1984; 40: 1079-1087
      1. O'Brien R, Castelloe J: Exploiting the link between the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test and a simple odds statistic. SUGI 31 Proceedings, Paper 209-231, 2005

        • Porzio G.
        • Aielli F.
        • Verna L.
        • Shodia-E-Razavi G.
        • Tudini M.
        • Cannita K.
        • Ficorella C.
        Effective analgesic score: A “marker” of the effects of chemotherapy on pain in advanced cancer patients?.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007; 34: 339-342
        • Reeves M.
        The influence of age on sample size calculation in acute pain trials using morphine consumption as an end point.
        Anesth Analg. 2010; 110: 1186-1190
        • Reinhart D.J.
        • Stagg K.S.
        • Walker K.G.
        • Wang W.P.
        • Parker C.M.
        • Jackson H.H.
        • Walker E.B.
        Postoperative analgesia after peripheral nerve block for podiatric surgery: Clinical efficacy and chemical stability of lidocaine alone versus lidocaine plus ketorolac.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000; 25: 506-513
        • Reinhart D.J.
        • Wang W.
        • Stagg K.S.
        • Walker K.G.
        • Bailey P.L.
        • Walker E.B.
        • Zaugg S.E.
        Postoperative analgesia after peripheral nerve block for podiatric surgery: Clinical efficacy and chemical stability of lidocaine alone versus lidocaine plus clonidine.
        Anesth Analg. 1996; 83: 760-765
        • Rohmel J.
        • Gerlinger C.
        • Benda N.
        • Lauter J.
        On testing simultaneously non-inferiority in two multiple primary endpoints and superiority in at least one of them.
        Biom J. 2006; 48: 916-933
        • Romundstad L.
        • Breivik H.
        • Roald H.
        • Skolleborg K.
        • Haugen T.
        • Narum J.
        • Stubhaug A.
        Methylprednisolone reduces pain, emesis, and fatigue after breast augmentation surgery: A single-dose, randomized, parallel-group study with methylprednisolone 125 mg, parecoxib 40 mg, and placebo.
        Anesth Analg. 2006; 102: 418-425
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Moher D.
        CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2010; 340: c332
        • Senn S.J.
        Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials.
        Stat Med. 1989; 8: 467-475
        • Silverman D.G.
        • O'Connor T.Z.
        • Brull S.J.
        Integrated assessment of pain scores and rescue morphine use during studies of analgesic efficacy.
        Anesth Analg. 1993; 77: 168-170
      2. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, 2012

        • Therasse E.
        • Choinière M.
        • Soulez G.
        • Oliva V.L.
        • Rousseau P.
        • Fugère F.
        • Boudreault D.
        • Cusson J.R.
        Percutaneous biliary drainage: Clinical trial of analgesia with interpleural block.
        Radiology. 1997; 205: 663-668
        • Turk D.C.
        • Dworkin R.H.
        • Revicki D.
        • Harding G.
        • Burke L.B.
        • Cella D.
        • Cleeland C.S.
        • Cowan P.
        • Farrar J.T.
        • Hertz S.
        • Max M.B.
        • Rappaport B.A.
        Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: An IMMPACT survey of people with pain.
        Pain. 2008; 137: 276-285
        • Wachtel R.
        • Dexter F.
        • Epstein R.
        • Ledolter J.
        Meta-analysis of desflurane and propofol average times and variability in times to extubation and following commands.
        Can J Anaesth. 2011; 58: 714-724
        • Wininger S.J.
        • Miller H.
        • Minkowitz H.S.
        • Royal M.A.
        • Ang R.Y.
        • Breitmeyer J.B.
        • Singla N.K.
        A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, repeat-dose study of two intravenous acetaminophen dosing regimens for the treatment of pain after abdominal laparoscopic surgery.
        Clin Ther. 2010; 32: 2348-2369