Thank you for the comments regarding the methadone safety guideline from the American
Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence.
1
Regarding the strength of evidence, in situations involving patient safety, clinical
practice guideline recommendations and other policy decisions frequently must be made
on the basis of limited evidence. For example, black box warnings issued by the Food
and Drug Administration and drug withdrawals are often based primarily on case reports
of serious adverse events,
- Chou R.
- Cruciani R.A.
- Fiellin D.A.
- Compton P.
- Farrar J.T.
- Haigney M.C.
- Inturrisi C.
- Knight J.R.
- Otis-Green S.
- Marcus S.M.
- Mehta D.
- Meyer M.C.
- Portenoy R.
- Savage S.
- Walsh S.
- Zeltzer L.
Methadone safety: A clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society and
College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society.
J Pain. 2014; 15: 321-337
3
and recommendations regarding laboratory monitoring for many medications (eg, monitoring
patients started on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for hyperkalemia) are
primarily based on the potential for detecting adverse events, rather than on direct
evidence that such efforts reduce harms. In the case of methadone safety, the strength
of evidence supporting the recommendations is generally low because there are no studies
showing that the recommended actions result in a reduction in overdose or other serious
adverse events, so that there is low certainty in estimates of benefit. Methods from
the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working
Group for developing clinical practice guidelines allow for strong recommendations
to be made despite weak evidence in certain situations, on the basis of the potential
benefits relative to harms, cost and burdens, and other factors, despite the uncertainty.
2
In the opinion of the panel of experts convened by the American Pain Society and
College on Problems of Drug Dependence to develop the methadone safety guideline,
the large increase in the number of methadone deaths, the unique properties of methadone
(including its long and variable half-life and association with electrocardiographic
QTc interval prolongation), and the availability of alternative therapies warrants
a cautious approach that prioritizes patient safety. At the same time, the low strength
of evidence grades for many of the recommendations underscore the need for additional
research to better understand the benefits, harms, costs, and burdens of strategies
intended to improve methadone prescribing safety.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The Journal of PainAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Methadone safety: A clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society.J Pain. 2014; 15: 321-337
- Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: Going from evidence to recommendations.BMJ. 2008; 336: 1049-1051
- Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications.JAMA. 2002; 287: 2215-2220
Article info
Footnotes
The Methadone Safety Guidelines received financial support from The American Pain Society.
The author reports no conflicts of interest.
Identification
Copyright
© 2014 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Methadone Safety Guidelines: A New Care Delivery ParadigmThe Journal of PainVol. 15Issue 9
- PreviewWe applaud the recently published Methadone Safety Guidelines by Chou and colleagues for its comprehensive approach to ensuring patient safety during both initiation and maintenance phases of methadone treatment.2 This guideline mirrors a previously published cardiac safety guideline in methadone treatment5 focused on prolongation of the QTc interval and extends its focus to mitigation of the risks of respiratory depression and opioid misuse via routine urine drug testing. This is increasingly relevant since the distinction between opioid treatment for chronic pain and opioid dependency is not always clear in clinical practice.
- Full-Text
- Preview