Advertisement

The Current State of Physical Therapy Pain Curricula in the United States: A Faculty Survey

  • Marie K. Hoeger Bement
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kathleen A. Sluka
    Correspondence
    Address reprint requests to Kathleen A. Sluka, PT, PhD, FAPTA, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, 1-248 MEB, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242.
    Affiliations
    Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Pain Research Program, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
    Search for articles by this author
Published:November 11, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.001

      Highlights

      • The average contact hours teaching pain in physical therapy curricula was 31 hours.
      • The majority of schools that responded covered the science of pain, assessment, and management.
      • Less than 50% of respondents were aware of the Institute of Medicine report on pain or the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines for physical therapy pain education.
      • 61% of respondents believed that their students received adequate education in pain management.

      Abstract

      Insufficient pain education is problematic across the health care spectrum. Recent educational advancements have been made to combat the deficits in pain education to ensure that health care professionals are proficient in assessing and managing pain. The purpose of this survey was to determine the extent of pain education in current Doctorate of Physical Therapy schools in the United States, including how pain is incorporated into the curriculum, the amount of time spent teaching about pain, and the resources used to teach about pain. The survey consisted of 10 questions in the following subject areas: basic science mechanisms and concepts about pain, pain assessment, pain management, and adequacy of pain curriculum. The overall response was 77% (167/216) for the first series of responses of the survey (Question 1), whereas 62% completed the entire survey (Questions 2–10). The average contact hours teaching about pain was 31 ± 1.8 (mean ± standard error of the mean) with a range of 5 to 115 hours. The majority of schools that responded covered the science of pain, assessment, and management. Less than 50% of respondents were aware of the Institute of Medicine report on pain or the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines for physical therapy pain education. Only 61% of respondents believed that their students received adequate education in pain management. Thus, this survey demonstrated how pain education is incorporated into physical therapy schools and highlighted areas for improvement such as awareness of recent educational advancements.

      Perspective

      This article demonstrates how pain education is incorporated into physical therapy curricula within accredited programs. Understanding the current structure of pain education in health professional curriculum can serve as a basis to determine if recent publications of guidelines and competencies impact education.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Pain
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Archer TM. Response rates to expect from web-based surveys and what to do about it. J Extension [Online], 46(3), June 2008. Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2008june/rb3.php

        • Basbaum A.I.
        • Bautista D.M.
        • Scherrer G.
        • Julius D.
        Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain.
        Cell. 2009; 139: 267-284
      2. Belfer I: Nature and nurture of human pain. Scientifica, vol 2013, Article ID 415279, 19 pages, 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/415279

        • Burckhardt C.S.
        • Clark S.R.
        • Bennett R.M.
        The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: Development and validation.
        J Rheumatol. 1991; 18: 728-734
        • Butler D.S.
        • Moseley L.S.
        Explain Pain.
        Noigroup Publications, Adelaide2003
        • Cheatle M.D.
        • O'Brien C.P.
        Opioid therapy in patients with chronic noncancer pain: Diagnostic and clinical challenges.
        Adv Psychosom Med. 2011; 30: 61-91
        • Cleeland C.S.
        Measurement of pain by subjective report.
        in: Chapman C.R. Loeser J.D. Issues in Pain Measurement. Raven Press, New York1989: 391-403
        • Cousins M.J.
        • Lynch M.E.
        The Declaration Montreal: Access to pain management is a fundamental human right.
        Pain. 2011; 152: 2673-2674
        • Doorenbos A.Z.
        • Gordon D.B.
        • Tauben D.
        • Palisoc J.
        • Drangsholt M.
        • Lindhorst T.
        • Danielson J.
        • Spector J.
        • Ballweg R.
        • Vorvick L.
        • Loeser J.D.
        A blueprint of pain curriculum across prelicensure health sciences programs: One NIH pain consortium center of excellence in pain education (CoEPE) experience.
        J Pain. 2013; 12: 1533-1538
        • Fairbank J.C.
        • Couper J.
        • Davies J.B.
        • O'Brien J.P.
        The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.
        Physiotherapy. 1980; 66: 271-273
        • Fishman S.M.
        • Ballantyne J.C.
        • Rathmell J.P.
        Bonica's Management of Pain.
        Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore2009
        • Fishman S.M.
        • Young H.M.
        • Lucas Arwood E.
        • Chou R.
        • Herr K.
        • Murinson B.B.
        • Watt-Watson J.
        • Carr D.B.
        • Gordon D.B.
        • Stevens B.J.
        • Bakerjian D.
        • Ballantyne J.C.
        • Courtenay M.
        • Djukic M.
        • Koebner I.J.
        • Mongoven J.M.
        • Paice J.A.
        • Prasad R.
        • Singh N.
        • Sluka K.A.
        • St Marie B.
        • Strassels S.A.
        Core competencies for pain management: Results of an interprofessional consensus summit.
        Pain Med. 2013; 14: 971-981
        • Gaskin D.J.
        • Richard P.
        The economic costs of pain in the United States.
        J Pain. 2012; 13: 715-724
        • Gatchel R.J.
        • Peng Y.B.
        • Peters M.L.
        • Fuchs P.N.
        • Turk D.C.
        The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
        Psychol Bull. 2007; 133: 581-624
        • Hoeger-Bement M.K.
        • St. Marie B.J.
        • Nordstrom T.M.
        • Christensen N.
        • Mongoven J.M.
        • Koebner I.J.
        • Fishman S.M.
        • Sluka K.A.
        An interprofessional consensus of core competencies for prelicensure education in pain management: Curriculum application for physical therapy.
        Phys Ther. 2014; 94: 451-465
        • Hunter J.
        • Watt-Watson J.
        • McGillion M.
        • Raman-Wilms L.
        • Cockburn L.
        • Lax L.
        • Stinson J.
        • Cameron A.
        • Dao T.
        • Pennefather P.
        • Schreiber M.
        • Librach L.
        • Kavanagh T.
        • Gordon A.
        • Cullen N.
        • Mock D.
        • Salter M.
        An interfaculty pain curriculum: Lessons learned from six years experience.
        Pain. 2008; 140: 74-86
        • Institute of Medicine (U.S.)
        Committee on Advancing Pain Research Care and Education. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2011
      3. International Association for the Study of Pain. Available at: http://www.iasp-pain.org/Education/CurriculaList.aspx?navItemNumber=647. Accessed December 2014

        • Louw A.
        • Diener I.
        • Butler D.S.
        • Puentedura E.J.
        The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 2041-2056
        • McMahon S.
        • Kolzenburg M.
        • Tracey I
        • Turk D
        Wall and Melzack's Textbook of Pain.
        Elsevier, Philadelphia2013
        • Melzack R.
        The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods.
        Pain. 1975; 1: 277-299
        • Mezei L.
        • Murinson B.B.
        Johns Hopkins Pain Curriculum Development Team. Pain education in North American medical schools.
        J Pain. 2011; 12: 1199-1208
        • Moseley G.L.
        Evidence for a direct relationship between cognitive and physical change during an education intervention in people with chronic low back pain.
        Eur J Pain. 2004; 8: 39-45
        • Moseley G.L.
        • Nicholas M.K.
        • Hodges P.W.
        A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain.
        Clin J Pain. 2004; 20: 324-330
        • Murinson B.B.
        • Gordin V.
        • Flynn S.
        • Driver L.C.
        • Gallagher R.M.
        • Grabois M.
        Recommendations for a new curriculum in pain medicine for medical students: Toward a career distinguished by competence and compassion.
        Pain Med. 2013; 14: 345-350
        • Nijs J.
        • Van Houdenhove B.
        • Oostendorp R.A.
        Recognition of central sensitization in patients with musculoskeletal pain: Application of pain neurophysiology in manual therapy practice.
        Man Ther. 2010; 15: 135-141
        • Overmeer T.
        • Boersma K.
        • Denison E.
        • Linton S.J.
        Does teaching physical therapists to deliver a biopsychosocial treatment program result in better patient outcomes? A randomized controlled trial.
        Phys Ther. 2011; 91: 804-819
        • Scudds R.J.
        • Scudds R.A.
        • Simmonds M.J.
        Pain in the physical therapy (PT) curriculum: A faculty survey.
        Physiother Theory Pract. 2001; 17: 239-256
        • Singh R.M.
        • Wyant S.L.
        Pain management content in curricula of U.S. Schools of pharmacy.
        J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003; 43: 34-40
        • Sluka K.A.
        Mechanisms and Management of Pain for the Physical Therapist.
        IASP Press, Seattle2009
        • Thomas S.P.
        • Johnson M.
        A phenomenologic study of chronic pain.
        Wet J Nurs Res. 2000; 22: 683-705
        • Trafton J.A.
        • Oliva E.M.
        • Horst D.A.
        • Minkel J.D.
        • Humphreys K.
        Treatment needs associated with pain in substance use disorder patients: Implications for concurrent treatment.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004; 73: 23-31
        • Upshur C.C.
        • Luckmann R.S.
        • Savageau J.A.
        Primary care provider concerns about management of chronic pain in community clinic populations.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 652-655
        • Van Oosterwijck J.
        • Meeus M.
        • Paul L.
        • De Schryver M.
        • Pascal A.
        • Lambrecht L.
        • Nijs J.
        Pain physiology education improves health status and endogenous pain inhibition in fibromyalgia: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
        Clin J Pain. 2013; 29: 873-882
        • Watt-Watson J.
        • McGillion M.
        • Hunter J.
        • Choiniere M.
        • Clark A.J.
        • Dewar A.
        • Johnston C.
        • Lynch M.
        • Morley-Forster P.
        • Moulin D.
        • Thie N.
        • von Baeyer C.L.
        • Webber K.
        A survey of prelicensure pain curricula in health science faculties in Canadian universities.
        Pain Res Manag. 2009; 14: 439-444
        • Wolff M.S.
        • Michel T.H.
        • Krebs D.E.
        • Watts N.T.
        Chronic pain–assessment of orthopedic physical therapists' knowledge and attitudes.
        Phys Ther. 1991; 71: 207-214