Highlights
- •Experimental pain research may be especially susceptible to sampling bias.
- •Fear of pain was associated with perceived likelihood of participation.
- •Sensation-seeking was associated with participation in experimental pain research.
- •Sampling bias can threaten the validity and generalizability of pain research.
Abstract
Perspective
Key words
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The Journal of PainReferences
- Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).Med Care. 2007; 45: S1-S2
- Pain and the brain: Specificity and plasticity of the brain in clinical chronic pain.Pain. 2011; 152: S49-S64
- Role of anxiety sensitivity in pain-related fear and avoidance.J Behav Med. 1996; 19: 577-586
- Affective and behavioral paths toward the acquired capacity for suicide.J Soc Clin Psychol. 2012; 31: 81-100
- Volunteer bias in human sexuality research: Evidence for both sexuality and personality differences in males.Arch Sex Behav. 1996; 25: 125-140
- The illness/injury sensitivity index: An examination of construct validity.Depress Anxiety. 2006; 23: 340-346
- A power primer.Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155-159
- Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: the next generation.Clin J Pain. 2012; 28: 475-483
- Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability.Pain. 1999; 80: 329-339
- Selection bias in pain research.Pain. 1998; 74: 1-3
- Body mass index screening and volunteer bias.Ann Epidemiol. 2008; 18: 602-604
- Volunteer bias and the five-factor model.J Psychol. 1993; 127: 29-36
- Observer influences on pain.Pain. 2017; 158: 846-855
- G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191
- Classical conditioning differences associated with chronic pain: A systematic review.J Pain. 2017; 18: 889-898
- The weirdest people in the world?.Behav Brain Sci. 2010; 33: 61-135
- A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure.Scand J Stat. 1979; 6: 65-70
- Self-disclosure and the volunteer: A source of bias in laboratory experiments.J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971; 17: 130-136
- Prediction of placebo responses: a systematic review of the literature.Front Psychol. 2014; 5: 1079
- Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking.Pers Individ Dif. 2002; 32: 401-414
- Negative affect and sensitization to pain.Scand J Psychol. 2002; 43: 131-137
- Goals matter: Both achievement and pain-avoidance goals are associated with pain severity and disability in patients with low back and upper extremity pain.Pain. 2011; 152: 1382-1390
- Gender differences in the nonverbal communication of pain: A new direction for sex, gender, and pain research?.Pain. 2014; 155: 1927-1931
- Longitudinal associations between depression, anxiety, pain, and pain-related disability in chronic pain patients.Psychosom Med. 2015; 77: 333-341
- Development of the fear of pain questionnaire—III.J Behav Med. 1998; 21: 389-410
- Sampling in psychological research.Psychol Bull. 1940; 37: 331-365
- Sensory sensitivity and strategies for coping with pain.Am J Occup Ther. 2015; 69: 6904240010
- Acquisition and extinction of operant pain-related avoidance behavior using a 3 degrees-of-freedom robotic arm.Pain. 2016; 157: 1094-1104
- Extinction of fear generalization: A comparison between fibromyalgia patients and healthy control participants.J Pain. 2017; 18: 79-95
- Recruitment bias in chronic pain research: Whiplash as a model.Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 30: 1481-1489
- Sensation-seeking: Dopaminergic modulation and risk for psychopathology.Behav Brain Res. 2015; 288: 79-93
- Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000).Neurophysiol Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 30: 263-288
- Volunteer bias in human psychophysiological sexual arousal research: To whom do our research results apply?.J Sex Res. 1999; 36: 171-179
- The fear of pain questionnaire (FPQ): Further psychometric examination in a non-clinical sample.Pain. 2005; 116: 339-346
- The volunteer subject.Wiley, New York, NY1975
- The intention-behavior gap.Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2016; 10: 503-518
- Human pain research: Personality correlates of voluntarism among college women.Pers Individ Dif. 1991; 12: 497-500
- Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents.University of Texas Press, Austin, TX1978
- Volunteer bias in sexuality research.Arch Sex Behav. 1995; 24: 369-382
- Psychometric evaluation and short form development of The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR-6).Psihologija. 2016; 49: 263-276
- The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.Psychol Assess. 1995; 7: 524-532
- The relation between catastrophizing and the communication of pain experience.Pain. 2006; 122: 282-288
- Effects of mood on pain responses and pain tolerance: An experimental study in chronic back pain patients.Pain. 2008; 138: 392-401
- The Body Appreciation Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation.Body Image. 2015; 12: 53-67
- What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition.Body Image. 2015; 14: 118-129
- Learning to predict and control harmful events: Chronic pain and conditioning.Pain. 2015; 156: S86-S93
- Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art.Pain. 2000; 85: 317-332
- Fear-avoidance model of chronic musculoskeletal pain: 12 years on.Pain. 2012; 153: 1144-1147
- Avoidance behavior in chronic pain research: A cold case revisited.Behav Res Ther. 2015; 64: 31-37
- Pain, decisions, and actions: A motivational perspective.Front Neurosci. 2013; 7: 1-12
- The relation between pain-related fear and disability: A meta-analysis.J Pain. 2013; 14: 1019-1030
- Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal.Erlbaum, Hillsdale1979
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: K.K. is a doctoral researcher of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) Vlaanderen, Flanders, Belgium (grant ID 1111015N). Further, the contribution of J.M.A. was supported by Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Grant 446-15-011.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Supplementary data accompanying this article are available online at www.jpain.org and www.sciencedirect.com.