- •Many adults with hemophilia have chronic pain due to joint arthropathy.
- •Studies show a wide prevalence range of hemophilia-related chronic pain.
- •There is high variability in chronic pain definitions, samples and assessment methods.
- •Standardized criteria should be used to assess chronic pain in hemophilia.
- •Chronic and acute pain should be clearly distinguished in this research field.
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Distress in patients with bleeding disorders: a single institutional cross-sectional study.Haemophilia. 2015; 21: e456-e464
- Pain management survey in adult patients with severe hemophilia [poster abstract].Haemophilia. 2016; 22: 96
- Definitions in hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12: 1935-1939
- Introduction to Meta-Analysis.John Wiley & Sons, United Kingdom2009
- Assessments of pain, functional impairment, anxiety, and depression in US adults with hemophilia across patient-reported outcome instruments in the pain, functional impairment, and quality of life (P-FiQ) study.Eur J Haematol. 2018; 100: 5-13
- Management of US men, women, and children with hemophilia and methods and demographics of the Bridging Hemophilia B Experiences, Results and Opportunities into Solutions (B-HERO-S) study.Eur J Haematol. 2017; 98: 5-17
- Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994; 23: 129-138
- A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20: 37-46
- Chapter 10: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses.(eds)in: Higgins TJ Chandler J Cumpston M Li T Page MJ Welch VA Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 61, Cochrane. 2020
- Plug I: clinical outcome of moderate haemophilia compared with severe and mild haemophilia.Haemophilia. 2009; 15: 83-90
- An assessment of the relative influence of pain coping, negative thoughts about pain, and pain acceptance on health-related quality of life among people with hemophilia.Pain. 2009; 145: 169-175
- Haemophilia Experiences, Results and Opportunities (HERO) study: survey methodology and population demographics.Haemophilia. 2014; 20: 44-51
- Associations of quality of life, pain, and self-reported arthritis with age, employment, bleed rate, and utilization of hemophilia treatment center and health care provider services: results in adults with hemophilia in the HERO study.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015; 9: 1549-1560
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560
- Joint pain in people with hemophilia depends on joint status.Pain. 2011; 152: 2029-2035
- Pain management in patients with haemophilia: a European survey.Haemophilia. 2012; 18: 743-752
- The impact of social factors on outcomes in patients with bleeding disorders.Haemophilia. 2016; 22: 46-53
- Managing chronic pain in adults with haemophilia: current status and call to action.Haemophilia. 2015; 21: 41-51
- Pain in haemophilia: are we listening?.Haemophilia. 2016; 22: 175-178
- Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 14: 951-957
- JASP (Version 0.12.2) [Computer software].2020
- Checklist for Prevalence Studies.2020 (Adelaide, Australia)
- Patient, caregiver, and provider perceptions of pain and pain management in adolescents and young adults with bleeding disorders.Haemophilia. 2017; 23: 852-860
- The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174
- Wishes and worries of haemophilia patients. A patient survey from Bavaria.Hamostaseologie. 2017; 37: 117-126
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and Elaboration.PLOS Med. 2009; 6e1000100
- Recent advances in developing specific therapies for haemophilia.Br J Haematol. 2018; 181: 161-172
- Optimal management of hemophilic arthropathy and hematomas.J Blood Med. 2014; 5: 207-218
- Haemophilia Experiences, Results and Opportunities (HERO study) in Brazil: assessment of the psychosocial effects of haemophilia in patients and caregivers.Haemophilia. 2019; 25: 640-650
- Joint Outcomes Committee of the Universal Data Collection USHTCN: Prophylaxis usage, bleeding rates, and joint outcomes of hemophilia, 1999 to 2010: a surveillance project.Blood. 2017; 129: 2368-2374
- Chapter 3: defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis.in: CJ Higgins JPT Cumpston M Li T Page MJ Welch VA Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 61, Cochrane. 2020
- Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13: 147-153
- The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014; 3: 123-128
- How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature.JAMA. 2014; 312: 171-179
- The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain.Pain. 2019; 160: 77-82
- Pain prevalence, characteristics, and impact among people with hemophilia: findings from the first portuguese survey and implications for pain management.Pain Med. 2020; 21: 458-471
- Emotional distress in haemophilia: factors associated with the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms among adults.Haemophilia. 2018; 24: e344-e353
- Sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics of people with hemophilia in portugal: findings from the first national survey.TH Open. 2018; 2: e54-e67
- Assessment and management of pain in haemophilia patients.Haemophilia. 2011; 17: 839-845
- Epidemiology of Inhibitors in Persons with Severe Hemophilia a in the United States: analyses of a National Database [poster abstract].Blood. 2018; 132: 2470
- panelists tWGftMoH, co-authors: WFH guidelines for the management of hemophilia.Haemophilia. 2020; 26 (3rd edition): 1-158
- Defining chronic pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pain. 2017; 158: 2092-2107
- Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008-2012
- Pain assessment and management in haemophilia: a survey among Italian patients and specialist physicians.Haemophilia. 2018; 24: 766-773
- A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11.Pain. 2015; 156: 1003-1007
- Blood-induced joint disease: the pathophysiology of hemophilic arthropathy.J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 8: 1895-1902
- Pain and functional limitations in patients with severe haemophilia.Haemophilia. 2006; 12: 147-153
- Joint disease in haemophilia: pathophysiology, pain and imaging.Haemophilia. 2018; 24: 44-49
- Pain status of patients with severe haemophilic arthropathy.Haemophilia. 2001; 7: 453-458
- A national study of pain in the bleeding disorders community: a description of haemophilia pain.Haemophilia. 2012; 18: e115-e119
- Self-reported prevalence, description and management of pain in adults with haemophilia: methods, demographics and results from the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of life (P-FiQ) study.Haemophilia. 2017; 23: 556-565
- Report on the Annual Global Survey 2019.2020 (Montréal, Canada)
- Comprehensive management of chronic pain in haemophilia.Haemophilia. 2014; 20: e113-e120
- Haemophilia utilization group study - Part Va (HUGS Va): design, methods and baseline data.Haemophilia. 2011; 17: 729-736
Disclosures: This work was supported by the Novo Nordisk HERO Research Grant 2015. ACP has a doctoral fellowship (SFRH/BD/146135/2019) from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology. This work has been funded by National funds, through the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) - project UIDB/50026/2020 and UIDP/50026/2020.
The authors have no conflict of interest do declare.