This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Despite postoperative pain being a predictor for chronic postsurgical pain, postoperative
pain remains undertreated in children. Pediatric studies examining disparities in
acute pain outcomes are mostly limited to ambulatory surgeries. We evaluated risk
for severe post-surgical pain after major surgeries in children. In Cohort 1 (retrospective,
N=2788; 5 surgeries) and Cohort 2 (Prospective; N=360; spine/pectus surgery), surgical,
pain, opioid use, analgesia, demographics, Area deprivation index (ADI) data were
analyzed for association with outcomes sing Wilcoxon/Chi-square tests and linear regression
Outcomes: Pain score AUC and opioid use on postoperative days 0-2, regional analgesia.
Compositional analysis was conducted for %AUC for pain score<4, 4-7, and >7/10 using
Aitchison compositional scale. Genotyping and association of 355 variants (21 genes
in HPA/immune pathways) were studied (cohort 2). Cohort 1: Pain AUC was associated
with age (p=0.002), sex (p=0.004), surgery (p<0.001). ADI was higher in African Americans
(AA) (p<0.001). Opioid use was higher for abdominal surgery, lower with age and regional
use. Pain AUC and opioid use were not different between races, though NRS AUC% for
severe pain (POD2) and use of regional analgesia was higher in Whites (p<0.001). FLACC
and NRS were negatively correlated in AA but not Whites. Cohort 2: AUC POD0-2 was
higher among Whites compared to AA (p=0.002). Female sex (p=0.006), White race (p=0.026),
surgery type (p=0.001), age (p<0.001), weight (p<0.001) and preoperative pain (p<0.001)
were associated with AUC. 9 SNPs from stress genes: ANXA2, CRHR2, FKBP5, IGF2, MC2R
were associated with AUC (p<0.05). Both cohorts showed associations for age, sex,
race, preoperative pain and surgery type with acute post-surgical pain. Underlying
socioeconomic disparities and stress genomics need consideration in racially diverse
pain cohorts. Differences in education/understanding might influence regional analgesia
use. Potential provider bias in objective pain assessments in AA children needs to
be ruled out. Grant support from 1R01AR075857 (NIAMS).
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The Journal of PainAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.